|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
This is good...A++ |
Apr 24th |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
Thank you Mitch... |
Apr 9th |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
Thanks Robert,
Attached flipped image.
IMO flipping work only in some cases where multiple objects of interest are in the image, in a subject like this, 90% of the time this exercise doesn't really change much final output, it also depends how we are used to look at things and over time start liking in a particular way.
|
Apr 6th |
 |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
Thanks Brenda,
Not participated in PSA Competitions, will give a try.
|
Apr 5th |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Liked the abstract image, busy subject but different. Processing is good, visited this place in 2015, that time there was only one glass sculpture at the entrance, with more glass cacti now it must be more attractive. |
Apr 5th |
 |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
Problem is, wrong exposure and blown highlights, I have a different ver, processed little differently. |
Apr 5th |
 |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Robert,
Processing is good, try some different crop, Brenda's suggested crop is good too.
|
Apr 5th |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
Too much empty space at the bottom and heavy top, looks off balance to me, also image is about capturing the fish and not something in the distance in the flying direction. IMO by cropping focus and interest remains on the bird and fish, also this makes the water drops falling off the fish little more important and part of the subject. |
Apr 5th |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Good image, looks good, subject and background separation is good which gives some 3D pop to the subject. Liked. |
Apr 5th |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Jim,
This is good, well processed. Try cropping as suggested by Brenda, may look better.
|
Apr 5th |
| 78 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Great capture, well processed and sharp, nothing to suggest, you can try different crop with less of empty space. |
Apr 5th |
 |
5 comments - 6 replies for Group 78
|
5 comments - 6 replies Total
|