|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Liked it, looks good. cleaning up and less saturated treatment. |
Feb 12th |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
This looks good. |
Feb 12th |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Robert,
I tried as suggested and also reduce the bright spot of the middle part. |
Feb 6th |
 |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Thank you,
Reduced saturation and corrected some of Magenta. |
Feb 5th |
 |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Looks great with cleaning of less important things.
Thanks. |
Feb 5th |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
*
2) Same Image size |
Feb 5th |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Jim & Mitch
RAW Vs JPG
1) Same Image Sie
2) Same Pixel / inch
3) RAW files contain unprocessed data which makes Large File Size but the advantage is High Dynamic range, easy to recover information from Shadow and Highlight areas.
4) JPG files are processed in the camera and compressed, makes it small size and easy to handle.
Note: I always take in RAW +JPG. (JPG at low resolution for quick viewing), on a bright day I under expose by a stop, that makes easy to recover highlight details.
Most good camera comes with Dynamic range of 13 plus EV.
|
Feb 4th |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
This crop looks good too.
Thank you. |
Feb 2nd |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Thanks James,
I tried your suggestion, did not work, but i have another frame which is only of the feet without the Buddha, attached. |
Feb 2nd |
 |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Robert,
Thanks for your input, tried the way you suggested, flipping of image did not work for me, removed the frame as suggested, check the image I posted to the replay of Mitch.
I normally always shoot in RAW but, unfortunately this is not in RAW and could not recover detail from the middle overexposed portion.
I have another frame, only feet without Buddha, posted in replay to James. |
Feb 2nd |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Thanks Mitch, for your suggestion, did try, some improvement over my original posting.
I have another frame, only the feet without Buddha, posted in replay to James. |
Feb 2nd |
 |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Sure will try your suggestion.
|
Feb 1st |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Robert,
Welcome to the group,
This is good, very sharp and very well processed, nothing to suggest, very impressive.
Looking forward to some more close up / stack photos from you.
|
Feb 1st |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Wow, very interesting and the way you corrected perspective is really good and adds value to the original image.
About the processing, I would do differently, try pulling out colors by adjusting contrast and saturation.
Attached quick edit.
|
Feb 1st |
 |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Terry,
This is good, converting to Monochrome is a good idea. For the eyes, I will make one single catchlight spot and also little more darkening of the right side of the face.
Quick edit attached. |
Feb 1st |
 |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
James,
Processing is good and the sky looks better, the only suggestion I have is, try removing small sign board on the left and mask the road and just keep the way it is in the original file, not sure but it may look better.
|
Feb 1st |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Jim,
Well captured, processed and very good overall cleaning of the image, only suggestion is, try converting in to BW, this is one good subject for monochrome. |
Feb 1st |
| 78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Brenda,
Capture and processing is good but I would crop little differently, Monkey is too much on the left looks little off balance to me. Attached quick edit just for the crop. |
Feb 1st |
 |
6 comments - 12 replies for Group 78
|
6 comments - 12 replies Total
|
