|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 13 |
Nov 21 |
Comment |
Hi Wendy, I was browsing through images and yours caught my eye. Your image has a neat luminosity and color flow. (no pun intended.) The water itself has just a hint of rainbow effect. I glad that you kept the negative space on the right. It keeps your image from looking cramped. Beautiful work.
When I first looked at your image I thought that I had been to the same place. But My images were taken around Cherokee N.C. I hope one day I will be able to go to Australia. |
Nov 20th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 13
|
| 21 |
Nov 21 |
Reply |
Brian, I hope that pelvis doesn't belong to anyone here, or anyone I know. |
Nov 20th |
| 21 |
Nov 21 |
Reply |
Brian, I prefer this image. Even though the image has multiple complex elements, these elements appear to be unified and flow into each other creating a simple image, that's pleasant to look at. |
Nov 20th |
| 21 |
Nov 21 |
Reply |
Brian, I would be the last person to argue that artist's choice should not prevail. However, in my mind there is a difference between artist's choice and preference of viewers. e.g. I do not like the work of the Baroque school. For clarity I attached a very rough copy of what I meant.
When I tardily submitted my image, I was informed that no images were being submitted this month. |
Nov 18th |
 |
| 21 |
Nov 21 |
Comment |
Brian, thank you for sharing this intriguing image. I agree that we see many different objects, and the Roscharc principle applies. For some reason I see a color dissonance between the bronze tonality in the center, and the surrounding area. But that may be just me, or that I'm using a new notebook that has not been color corrected. |
Nov 17th |
1 comment - 3 replies for Group 21
|
| 65 |
Nov 21 |
Comment |
Charles, I agree with a most of Lynn's comments. However, I think that the white flowers in the background help the image. To my eye the blooms yu show have a quiet beauty. My thoughts are that if the entire background was darker, the soft feeling would disappear. Having said that, the green bud and the green stems in the lower middle, are distracting to me. |
Nov 16th |
| 65 |
Nov 21 |
Comment |
Lynn, To my taste you have created a beautiful work of art. Your use of negative space combined with the variations in luminosity of the plant, has created a great image. |
Nov 16th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 65
|
| 79 |
Nov 21 |
Comment |
Lauren, There is something about the way you handled the flowers that forces to me to want to keep looking at them. I agree with Karl on the spots on the green. his crop is a good way of eliminating the dark edges of the white petals. |
Nov 18th |
| 79 |
Nov 21 |
Comment |
Freddie, Very well done. I like the way you handled the colors. the the colors and luminosity, and the way the lines seem to blend where they should blend, and compliment when they should.
A short time ago I heard the following statement. "I never saw a reflection that I didn't like." Great image. |
Nov 18th |
| 79 |
Nov 21 |
Reply |
Our ultimate condition. We should enjoy the present. |
Nov 18th |
 |
| 79 |
Nov 21 |
Reply |
Judith, Thanks for your comments. I thought the original too flat, and for this scene, prefer a silky look. In Photoshop, I used a concocted combination of path and motion blending on different layers. Then hand painted some blur and brightness at different levels, a curve adjustment, after spot cloning. |
Nov 14th |
2 comments - 2 replies for Group 79
|
6 comments - 5 replies Total
|