|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 29 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Great capture! I would not change anything, at first I was not so sure about having the person in the background but it adds to the story and depicts an isolated area. |
Jun 18th |
| 29 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Gorgeous landscape shot! I tend to agree with Judy and perhaps I would lower the saturation on the foreground part. The darker area does not bother me, I think it makes it more dramatic and natural. Perhaps I would remove the few small antennas. Great shot! |
Jun 13th |
| 29 |
Jun 20 |
Reply |
Hi Judy, thank you:-) If I recall, it was challenging finding an ideal spot, I also traveled light and only brought one 16-35 lens with me on the trip but a 70-200 would have been better in my opinion. After reading articles about landscape photography, especially for Panorama it seems to be lens of choice and then stitch the images laterally & vertically. That requires having a 360 pano head to adjust the parralax - I ordered one as I am getting my feel wet with 360 images but won't have it for some time unfortunately. The good news about this image is its resolution being 50mp I have room to crop it and show off the mountain better. |
Jun 13th |
| 29 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Thank you Karen. I had not noticed the dead trees until you mentioned it:-) Not sure what could be done about it... |
Jun 13th |
3 comments - 1 reply for Group 29
|
3 comments - 1 reply Total
|
