|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Reply |
Lance, I altered nothing it was as displayed--see my description |
Jan 27th |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
The first thing that comes to my mind-OHHHH! what a sweet picture The way you captured her with her L arm drooped across the baby and hers eyes closed makes this image so appealing. I can see this hanging in a child's bedroom. Being picky it would be nice if the green leaves were removed
Good work Rick! |
Jan 8th |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
I have to say I do prefer the blue BG rather than the black, but you have brought out the bird much better in the finished image. Jim's comment re a border is much to my liking, as he pointed out our black BG sometimes envelops the image. |
Jan 8th |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
A fun image Mark and a precious one for the parents |
Jan 8th |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
There is absolutely no question that this is rightfully a B&W image. Contrary to Rick's tutor I was taught that the subject should be looking the camera, but I believe it depends upon the image. With the angle of the body there is no doubt that the October image is correct but on the other hand the Knight's eyes are well directed
Good work Pete! |
Jan 8th |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
What a contrast from the original! How you brought everything out from the original is remarkable. I just cannot see anything to add Jim, it is a stunning picture. |
Jan 8th |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
This is outstanding David and certainly a lot of work went into creating it. Although the picture of Queen Victoria is barely perceptible I prefer to the more easily seen copy of the vampire. His fingers are so prominent that they take away slightly from his face, unless your purpose was to accentuate this feature. Overall I cannot praise this highly enough! |
Jan 8th |
| 5 |
Jan 23 |
Reply |
Yes, of course the white is part of his markings, I hadn't thought about that, thanks Jim. |
Jan 1st |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 5
|
6 comments - 2 replies Total
|