|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 5 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
You achieved your goal Mark. Yet perhaps Pete's changes do add enhancement, either way it is lovely. |
Feb 14th |
| 5 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Thanks for the explanation Freddie and you made a beautiful image out of something so ordinary. I could not think of anything to add to make it any lovelier. |
Feb 10th |
| 5 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Don't see this kind of scene in reality, in the 80s this week in Florida. It's a simple
capture of a lovely scene, your eye caught it beautifully. I agree with the idea of a border. Lovely work Rick. |
Feb 10th |
| 5 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Nick this one missed your usual talent. Your head is too large (not really, just in this image!) and the whole just doesn't seem to fit together, but I do like the car.
I thought of you on Sunday and your team win. I can imagine how happy you were |
Feb 10th |
| 5 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
I pondered over this for sometime, unable to make up my mind. Certainly the mono is a better choice over the busy-ness of the original and it is a fascinating study. The only minute detail that I would change is to dull down, slightly, the shade of the LH lamp to prevent it from drawing my eye. I would also add a 2 pixel white border. |
Feb 10th |
| 5 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
This is absolutely stunning, the curve, the tree leaning into the water; your eye caught a great scene , I can't think of a thing to do to improve it--you already did. Good work David. |
Feb 10th |
| 5 |
Feb 21 |
Reply |
yes I think the cropping is good |
Feb 10th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 5
|
6 comments - 1 reply Total
|