|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 52 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
What a great image and you did a wonderful job lightening his face and the eyes. Superb and you certainly achieved your goal! Like Lisa & Pamela say I may have lightened up his lower arm and hand as it seems to me that there is not much differentation between the branch and his limb. Otherwise a great capture of the Howler. |
Sep 15th |
| 52 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
The 'First Yellow' is certainly very vibrant and a nice shade of yellow and like the 'High Key' contrast. My eye is drawn to the centre buds which don't appear to be in focus which is a bit distracting. I like the composition of the petals and their soft lines. |
Sep 15th |
| 52 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Yes it is heartbreaking with all these fires. Thank you so much for your advice and i will try the bracketing next time as i think this would definitely improve the image with HDR and lighten the foreground hills. |
Sep 15th |
| 52 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
This really is a summer beauty....i like the way you have focused on just this part of the flower and the angle of the image leads my eye right to the stamen with the soft diagnol curves of the petals. Nicely done. |
Sep 10th |
| 52 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Certainly looks a dreamy sunset and so tranquil too. I like the range of colours you have included with this image and how the light is reflecting off the water. I may have cropped off the bottom a bit as to me the foreground expanse of water doesn't hold much interest. Looked like a perfect evening! |
Sep 9th |
| 52 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
An unusual flower with its yellow core..looks like an icecream!
Great capture with the eye for detail and amazing focus. I like how you made it 'pop' in post...Agree with Mike on his 2 thoughts...Signature slightly does detract from this wonderful so smaller to me would be good. And i also use Topaz AI deNoise at the beginning of my post processing and seems to work for me. |
Sep 9th |
| 52 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Mike very helpful critique.. |
Sep 9th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 52
|
5 comments - 2 replies Total
|