|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
This is a beautiful image, but it seems to me it could be two images. One would be the mountains and reflection of the mountains which could be framed by some of the trees. The other area of interest is the tree roots. Regardless I would try to offset the distortion of the short focal length lens. |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
A travel brochure for sure. Building on Larry's comments, I would consider making this a pano, cropping down from both bottom and top. I would consider eliminating the white bridge in the background too |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I think this image was well seen and processed. I like the saturation of the blues. I agree with Larry's crop - anything close to 1/1 is best done as a square for esthetic reasons |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I agree with the comments this image is really flat. Several suggestions - increase clarity and move the white and black sliders to the end points of the histogram. For my eye, I agree a vertical subject in the foreground does black the eye. |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
thanks all for your comments. In a later version I did AI remove the limbs on the bottom right |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Well exposed and composed - except for the senior moment on the building. I think Grace captured the major comments |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I agree with the comments about the moon - it adds balance and interest. Nice job of processing the MW. You do have some star movement with the 25 sec exposure and have a lot of stars. For me, I would reduce the shutter speed to about 15 sec and not worry about getting all the stars (kind of a salt and pepper approach) |
Sep 24th |
7 comments - 0 replies for Group 36
|
7 comments - 0 replies Total
|