|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 62 |
May 19 |
Comment |
Not sure if it's my monitor or not, the image appear a bit dark. The highlight (even if it's overexposed) in the original is fabulous IMO. It has batter impact that way. I know a quite famous landscape photographer who often intentionally leave overexposed highlight spot in many of his work, which gave nice impact overall. I can see the same impact with the original.
My suggestion for the B&W is to leave the right side of the water have more highlight, which can help separate other part of the water/mountain. Just a thought. |
May 13th |
| 62 |
May 19 |
Comment |
A beautiful lady and portrait. The color version appear a softer and warmer feeling, where the B&W shows a beautiful tone of her skin. I like both version in different way. I do noticed that in the B&W you emphasized a lot in her eyes, which seems a bit harsh. Personally I like somewhere between the original and the B&W version (for the eyes). |
May 13th |
| 62 |
May 19 |
Comment |
Nice portrait of capturing his emotion. I second on emphasizing his face/eyes area by brighten it, and tune down some surrounding bright area to get better focus on the face and expression. |
May 13th |
| 62 |
May 19 |
Comment |
I like how you process this, great range of tone. There is nothing wrong to photograph, or interpenetrate other's art. Just like taking photo with a build, which is other's design, right? :-) The composition and closeness of the post- processing has a nice impact, making me thinking what might be in the artist's head, what he/she was trying to express. |
May 13th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 62
|
4 comments - 0 replies Total
|
