|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
Jan 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Paul for your pertinent suggestion.
I agree with you. However I can try to keep the shirt knot. |
Jan 17th |
| 39 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I really like the great space of this picture.
With the stones, the cloudy sky, it is obvious to convert it in B&W.
However I have a concern with this format. I, personally, think it doesn't work well for such a landscape. I try on my computer (27 in) 3 different crops 16/9 (top, bottom & a little both). I had 3 differents great pictures and I liked them very much. Please try. |
Jan 13th |
| 39 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
Indeed great street photography. Well done for the square format.
The triangle with the different people brings a lot.
You removed a bag and a person on the right. Good decision.
At what does he look? Interesting question... without answer.... |
Jan 13th |
| 39 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I like your own comment and agree with.
The color version is indeed interesting (information about the culture), but the B&W one will focus more on him.
The B&W is more softened and we are not "disturbed" by the color (Elliott Erwitt...). We go directly to his face and his eyes. Interesting position of his right arm. |
Jan 13th |
| 39 |
Jan 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Mary Ann.
I did that to try to soften the skin and to have this special effect. |
Jan 13th |
3 comments - 2 replies for Group 39
|
| 75 |
Jan 25 |
Reply |
Thanks for the information Murphy. |
Jan 22nd |
| 75 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
As I think I already wrote I and it is also mentioned in these comments, we often have two "subjects" with you Mo, namely the working method and after, the realisation. Always a pleasure if we can understand everything...
We have many differents colors. I like it. We can see some small "disturbing" details, but as we are attracted by the colors an the very sharp leaves, we don't see them. |
Jan 17th |
| 75 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
The huge difference between a processed and a non processed picture.
Just great in B&W. Composition, very smooth (soft), background, ... A well finished work. Well done.
|
Jan 17th |
| 75 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I like the composition, well done.
I agree with the background. The bottom left corner has part of petals, which disturb me a little. Almost he same the right. As the composition is old, it is better to remove this parts than to crop it. |
Jan 17th |
| 75 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
Very nice image of a rain forest. You were at the right time.
The trees on the background give the impression of a strange forest. In fact I see three kinds of trees (3 grounds). Foreground the tree with the moos, behind the trees with the leaves and in the background, "my" strange forest.
When looking to the subjects seen by the good eyes of Ray, Ki was attracted by the brown object (part of a branch?).
Very good nature picture. |
Jan 17th |
| 75 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
Thanks Murphy for your comment.
A more vertical format can be too strict, too classic, don't you think?
I agree I can still crop a little. |
Jan 17th |
| 75 |
Jan 25 |
Reply |
Thanks Ray for your comment.
It is tilt just because I took so the picture. I didn't think to change its inclinaison. I agree to crop a little all around, there is enough space and the stem is long enough to keep it. |
Jan 17th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 75
|
8 comments - 4 replies Total
|