|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
I like the pictures, both pictures. First time in some years that I like the colors versions in this B&W group....
Great composition (the way through the doors) and the light.
The B&W is quite dark in the bottom left corner and we lose details.
I like the the "brown" in the color version and the texture of the old doors.
Sorry for you camera. Thanks for your advice. Indeed a second camera is always useful. My personal advice (experience): NEVER let a camera "alone", event on a tripod. I am always within 20 in from my camera. Of course, an incident can happen (even alone). |
Dec 17th |
| 39 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
It needs some time to look at and to read all the picture. I like that.
There is a lot to see, and I agree with Paul, I would like to see more (More of the trees, the barn, ...).
This picture should be seen in big dimensions. I saw it with 27 in, Great.
Initially I thought a panoramic picture (with 3 pictures), but it is not. It is a fous stack of 3 pictures. For a pano, don't forget to take the picture in the portait format (and not landscape), you will have much more information. |
Dec 17th |
| 39 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
At first sight, this is subject and composition for a B&W picture. I like it. Beautiful sky and lines with the sand.
However, the beautiful colors are lost (the blue on the first one, the multicolor panels on the second one, and the red on the fourth one). Except that, the B&W is stronger with the contrast.
It is your choice. |
Dec 17th |
| 39 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
A sunset is often "better" in colors, for the colors we are looking for.
You B&W version is quite dark and takes the magic out of colors. Same opinion about the snow.
I like the color version. It can happen. |
Dec 17th |
| 39 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Good suggestion to be more on the right. Thanks Mary Ann.
Please find a picture (suggestion). |
Dec 17th |
 |
| 39 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Thank you very much Paul, I really like your proposition.
An image needs to be worked. I saw with your version the connection between the poles and the clouds, what I didn't see on my B&W version. |
Dec 17th |
4 comments - 2 replies for Group 39
|
| 75 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
What a (interesting) story with this beautiful image and flower.
The composition (the flower in fact) is surprising, as the nature of the flower is (and how this eating machine works). |
Dec 19th |
| 75 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
Great Job.
No matter how it is done, the result (composition, light and background) is very beautiful. |
Dec 19th |
| 75 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
Nice colors with the background. I also appreciate the composition and the water drops.
The "problem" is already raised, namely the lack of sharpness. Some people can take a picture at 1/60, I can't. |
Dec 19th |
| 75 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
I also like very the contrast between the colors and the background. Just outstanding.
About the background, near the top of the stem, it is still the "old" one and it is a little disturbing once you gave seen it.
Some petals are cut, and I like it, it is maybe form some "out of the rules", and it well done, as two petals are not.
The stamens are well sharped.
Maybe a suggestion: a little bit more on the right , if its is possible, to have a petal as background for the stamens. |
Dec 19th |
| 75 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Ray for your analysis. |
Dec 19th |
4 comments - 1 reply for Group 75
|
8 comments - 3 replies Total
|