|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Thanks Paul for your comment.
The lightening is an important subject, not easy to master... |
Nov 15th |
| 39 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
In a word: Perfect.
Much better (for me) in B&W.
Very soft image. Well lighted. Great reflection. Well composed.
The thin frame around finishes the image.
|
Nov 10th |
| 39 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Very strong image: bear in action and splashing water is not burnt, and is even well lighted.
For the gull, I have the same question as Jerry.
It is part of the image: ok, and keep it. This is the reality.
It has been added: not necessary for me. The bear is the subject and is perfect alone. |
Nov 10th |
| 39 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Il like the difference of attitude between the man and the dog. As you mentioned, he noticed you.
I like the square format. But here is the left part (bricks) not a little disturbing, and a portait size could have been used. Just an comment.
Good idea to remove the pipping. |
Nov 10th |
| 39 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
You reached your objective. Special activity for the club...
I like the composition, and of course the sharp head (with eyes) and the tong.
I am a little disturbed by the white line on the left. It gives the impression of a step, that is not present on the right. |
Nov 10th |
| 39 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Just a great moment of life for a great image. On the right time, at the right place (with your camera...). Job really well done.
I like the eyes (clean and visible), and the fur.
The B&W (sepia) works well (there are no color). Good editing.
|
Nov 10th |
| 39 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
The colors are nice, but the B&W version is, as often, more stronger. We are no more disturbed by the color, as said Elliot Erwitt.
I like the crop to better be attracted by the subject, and the light on it.
Not always easy LR, good job for the solution. |
Nov 10th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 39
|
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Sorry Mo. Small leaves in the center and big ones on the sides. |
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Thanks for the technical information.
We are in the intellectual and artistic photography, also a new domain....
Great colors and sharpness. I have concerns with the 2 kinds of flowers (leaves). A personal suggestion: big leaves with 3 small one or a square format with the small ones. |
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
The Artistic photography. A new/different domain. The original is a flower, the modified one is an artistic presentation of a flower.
I can't do it. I like it . Very well illuminated.
We often forget the thin border... |
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
New subject, new kind of picture for me (and for others I suppose).
1/6400s and f/22, it should be completely dark (without the flash). Not a "0" too many? Not important.
I like the form and sharpness of the petals.
I agree with Murphy for the large border. I think you need one, a thin one, not one that catches the eyes. |
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
You have the good idea to try something new. Good job. Not always easy at the beginning, specially with this kind of pictures.
In this case, it is quite difficult to understand the picture.
Please go on.
|
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Congratulations for this picture at 1/15 s even with the technology. Even if the "how" doesn't matter, it is always interesting to know what is possible to realize.
Just beautiful leaves. The light and the sharpness are great. We can analyze the leaves...
Good idea for the vignetting. |
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
The beautiful colors of autumn.
The green leaves bring an interesting "other color" in the red. A kind of contrast not only of color, but also of "live" between the leaves that have already changed of colors and those that didn't yet.
I like the composition of the stem and the berries. |
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Hi Murphy,
Thanks for you comment.
I agree with you about aperture. We have to choose. |
Nov 21st |
| 75 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Thanks Gaetan for you comments.
I agree with you about the possible colors confusion. |
Nov 21st |
6 comments - 3 replies for Group 75
|
12 comments - 4 replies Total
|