|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I prefer your second version. Is there also more contrast?
I like the 3 elements (houses, mountains ans clouds (always clouds in my comment when there is a sky...)) and their position. A picture for the B&W.
There is a little bit of space missing (too cropped), isn't it (my opinion)? |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The composition is great, I like it very much. The 3 parts (areas) of the image and the position of the tree.
As done by some of us, there are many options to treat the image. It depends on everyone's sensibility. However, I think on each case we have to keep the structure of the tree and its leaves, so not too dark.
I like the "of course, the light was awful".... I like the comment (the "of course"...), not the fact the light was awful... We also need some luck to take pictures... |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Very beautiful image.
I like the angle of view (were you high-up to take the picture?), and the great (in quantity and quality) tonality.
Majestic "building", sharpness, movement of water and clouds. You have all the characteristics of a great image. |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Very beautiful image.
I like the angle of view (were you high-up to take the picture?), and the great (in quantity and quality) tonality.
Majestic "building", sharpness, movement of water and clouds. You have all the characteristics of a great image. |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Not necessary to place a date for the picture...
Enough space around the panel? This is your choice. |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
When locking and analyzing the picture, I liked the composition (triangle made by the group and the 2 men), I liked the details in the white and the 2 attitudes of the 2 men (one locking at us, the other not). That was my opinion.
When reading the comments, this was written by David. So nothing new from me ..., but happy to think as David... |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
When locking and analyzing the picture, I liked the composition (triangle made by the group and the 2 men), I liked the details in the white and the 2 attitudes of the 2 men (one locking at us, the other not). That was my opinion.
When reading the comments, this was written by David. So nothing new from me ..., but happy to think as David... |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I like the comments. Nice toy, cheap fun, fun to use and inexpensive, ... There are important characteristics for the photographer...
It gives dynamic at the picture. If you look at it too long, you begin to swirl... |
May 26th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Hello Larry,
No problem at all. On the contrary, thank you for the initiative and effort, and the suggestion.
My initial image needs contrast... |
May 6th |
| 39 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks David for your comment. I agree with and I try a new version.. I think (and hope) it is better.
I think the color version is also a good one or a better one ... |
May 1st |
 |
8 comments - 2 replies for Group 39
|
8 comments - 2 replies Total
|