|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Reply |
Lois,
Thanks for your answer.
If you have done that, it is intentionally. So I wanted to know why. It is also a way of learning.
Indeed you answer my question. I agree with the second reason. The first is personal.
Thanks again.
Vincent
|
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello everybody,
Thanks for your comments.
I like also the soft light of the color image.
That's was the beginning of the dance. No barre.
Thanks again for your comment.
Vincent |
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello Lois,
Indeed a great image.
Thanks for the description how you achieve this result.
First impression: why not more symmetrical, with a square format and turn the image a little bit to the right.
As it is your your choice, to help me (us) to understand it, can you explain why you let so much space to the right? Thanks in advance for your explication.
Vincent
|
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello Don,
At first sight I said to myself why he didn't take the picture more from the left to use and see the space. As the main subject is this beautiful house, you are right and the composition is also right.
The treatment gives an old rendering which suits very well with the house.
The house is soft as the clouds. Everything pasts together and gives a nice picture.
Vincent
|
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello Paul,
I can not describe my meaning without taking time. Indeed, I need to "be" there. And it is what happens when you take time to look at the picture.
The horizon is n the half of the picture. It is not a problem as the 2 parts are very nice.
The upper side of the wave on the right is just at the horizon line. I didn't see it at first sight. It equilibrates the picture as it was another rock. We have now 4 "main" structures in the picture (3 rocks and the wave). I like it very much.
However I find the structure of the clouds too "sweet".
Vincent
|
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello Jerry,
We see more and more this kind of picture (a picture with inside a camera taking a picture), and I am happy of that.
It is a combination of architecture and street motion.
When you start at the cellular phone you can make a circle sight (around the tube) with the metallic structures. I like that very much.
Always nice the photo shoot of camera club. |
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello Arfan,
Very nice picture and thank a lot for the description of how you took the picture. I was living the scene when reading. Thank you for that.
Special treatment. We like it or not, but it has the advantage to be special and different of what we usually see. Well done.
The look of the child is strong and just in your objective. |
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello David,
My comments without having read the other comments.
First impression at first sight: I like the composition (diagonal) and the format, but I am quite (a lot) disturbed by the "stem?" of ? on the lower left side, and I can't appreciate the picture.
However, the more I look at the picture the more I really like it. We have to take time to appreciate .... The structure of the background is very interesting.
With or without the flowers on the right, that will give 2 different pictures. So, it is a personal choice. Personally, I will keep it for the diagonal and balance.
Now I read the other comments.
Twig is maybe better than stem... |
Jun 21st |
| 39 |
Jun 18 |
Comment |
Hello David,
Thanks for the comment.
Adjustment in LR:
Classic correction for the lens and camera.
Correction for the noise (6400 ISO) and sharpness
Classic correction for the level.... "Touch V" for B&W. After: Expo -0,65, Shadow + 55, white +40.
The most important: the brush (- 3,25 for exposition) to darken the background.
I agree with for the fourth dancer. Thera are "+" & "-". With the dancer it gives dynamism, less classic. I prefer with 4, there were also 4.
Have a good afternoon, and good night for me. |
Jun 8th |
8 comments - 1 reply for Group 39
|
8 comments - 1 reply Total
|