|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 2 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
I agree with Shirley..awesome!....very nice front and back lighting and action. I don't think you need that much saturation but understand the desire to pop the image, but great as is. |
Oct 15th |
| 2 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
I agree the sky is great, but would leave it as is and not saturate that much, just use them to enhance the mountains. I agree that you don't need a foreground object that is not apparently contributing. I would be interested to know your technical data for the shot and if you used a polarizer. |
Oct 15th |
| 2 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Great composition and harmonizing the two girls with good lighting effect and allowing space for the right-hand girl's stare, but would cut a fraction of the dead-space to 1/3 of total image. I like the blue genes and think the color blue should stay, perhaps by de-saturating the remaining image. |
Oct 15th |
| 2 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Impressive image. On stepping back I would cut a fraction off the foreground since it is almost empty and is not contributing to the central theme of the image. |
Oct 15th |
| 2 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
The unique tallness and mid-tone texture is well-shown. I noticed the graininess and was surprised to see it at 100 ISO and wonder if de-noising is light-room or even adding contrast is still possible after HDR. Also I can't help thinking the scene would change at sunset. |
Oct 15th |
| 2 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Great image. I like the catch-light, dark around the eyes and uneven mouth resulting in an expressive pose. Impressive use of post-processing. |
Oct 15th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 2
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|