|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
Sounds like all are in agreement with using Topaz. Thanks for sharing this information with me. |
Apr 21st |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
WOW, I can't believe the difference that Topas Sharpen made! I will definitely look into this program for the future. |
Apr 21st |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
Totally agree with your suggestions. I'm planning to print this image and definitely make changes before I print. |
Apr 21st |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
I think your edited version is well done (sharp, not blown out) but I must say I think the original fish-eye version in intriguing. I think that including your shadow adds to that intrigue. I would change the title to "Gaining Perspective on the Past". |
Apr 17th |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Joan, what an interesting structure. I can't believe that your image was taken with an I-phone. Your post processing was well done (your correction of the vertical perspective took it to the next level) and the image almost has a cartoon effect about it. I agree with Renee, black and white was the way to go with this image. My only suggestion would be to whiten the background a bit more. |
Apr 16th |
 |
| 16 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Rene, I think you ended up mastering long exposure! This is definitely a very intriguing image. It is sharp, not at all blown out except for the one bright light in the center. I played with it a bit to isolate the green spinning ride, since to me, it was the most interesting. I tried using the Puppet Warp in Photoshop to see if I could add interest by changing the shop. This is by no means my area of expertise but I am wondering if interest can be added by making something totally new from what you began with. |
Apr 15th |
 |
3 comments - 3 replies for Group 16
|
3 comments - 3 replies Total
|