|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
All great suggestions. Can't wait to try flipping to see how it looks with players on the right.
Thank you! |
Jan 27th |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Reply |
Yes, unfortunately someone was standing next to the bike, so I did not include it. I will attempt cropping the right side |
Jan 16th |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Walter, looking at your original, this image has come a long way. With that said, the amount of shadows and the lost of pixel information in the bright whites makes this image very difficult to improve on. In spite of its challenges, you did capture the grace of this egret in flight. |
Jan 12th |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
WOW..... I think this is a GREAT image. Your cropping and color adjustments are spot on! I am putting this place on my bucket list.... |
Jan 12th |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
What a fun image! I think the angle of the neck and head make this a pleasing composition. I do like the coloring (both in the giraffe and background) in the original better. It feels more authentic. Not sure if the original is actually the image you altered (looking at the position of the mouth). Also not sure what I am seeing just outside the mouth on the processed image. Would love to see a bit of a catch light in the eyes even if you have to insert it. |
Jan 12th |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Joan, great image! I can't believe the depth you were able to capture. I think adding the texture really helped this image come to life. Thanks for sharing! |
Jan 10th |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Bunny, what a WONDERFUL image! It has such powerful, mysterious feel about it. I agree that the sky could be more interesting (which it was in your original). I don't feel the clouds need to be whiter per say....just detailed and varied (which the original were). I am wondering if you could have isolated the sky and the tower separately and worked on each if it would improve the overall image. |
Jan 10th |
| 16 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
This is a very promising image. I do agree that the waterfall in your edited version is overexposed however it is not nearly as overexposed in the original. I am wondering if you could have used the Quick Selection tool in Photoshop, then went to Select, Inverse next, made your adjustments which should effected all other areas and not the waterfall. I think it is well worth trying. This image is well cropped and well colored otherwise. |
Jan 10th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 16
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|