|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Ian |
Feb 18th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Reply |
Thank you Ella |
Feb 7th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Hello Paul. It certainly looks cold. My attention immediately
goes to the triangle formed by the two logs. My guess is that is what caught your attention. It would have caught mine as well. I might have cropped out the tree on the left that is leading away from the subject. I have not made any successful snow images because I have failed to obtain contrast in the snow to show its detail and avoid white emptiness. I think you have avoided this issue but perhaps a bit more separation
in the snow might be helpful. |
Feb 6th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
John, sorry I don't understand the closed sign. |
Feb 6th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Ella I am 'Knot' surprised that you were able to create an interesting image. I like the lighting and the texture it reveals. One can feel the coarseness of the line. The image is also an interesting design for me. |
Feb 6th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
|
Feb 6th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Michael I am not knowledgeable about this genera of photography. However I am aware that getting contrast to identify the glyphs is not an easy task. I think you have done very well in making the glyphs stand out. Good job. |
Feb 6th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Ian I also like the concept. I would like the figure to more visible if possible. |
Feb 6th |
| 31 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Peter, a wonderful image. I noticed that in the upper left quadrant there seems to be a gray spot, as if it had been excessively processed, no detail. however I will ignore that and enjoy a very beautiful image. |
Feb 6th |
7 comments - 2 replies for Group 31
|
7 comments - 2 replies Total
|