|
Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
11 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Wow! What a wonderful image. Great interest. Great composition. Sharp. Much more interesting than the original. I have no suggestions. |
Feb 8th |
11 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
A very unusual image but to me it seems to lack a sense of direction and is somewhat flat. So in my revision I flipped the image horizontally and now like the way the image seems to flow from bottom left to top right. I then brightened the ropes but not the background. I also eliminated the black spot on one of the ropes. |
Feb 8th |
 |
11 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Henry, many thanks. |
Feb 8th |
11 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
A wonderful image photographed at a precise moment. However, I am bothered by the large white object at the bottom of the image. So I cloned parts of the clothing to bring the garment down to cover the white object. I also cloned out some dark spots in the background. And, I also brightened the face and also the overall image. |
Feb 8th |
 |
11 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Wonderful shot. Only minor suggestion would be to reduce noise. |
Feb 7th |
 |
11 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
A wonderful image and a great conversion from the original. I like Henry's suggestion to flip horizontally and in my revision I also lightened and blurred the background. |
Feb 7th |
 |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 11
|
18 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Another wonderful conversion. So much better than the original. I have no suggestions. |
Feb 8th |
18 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
I love your creation, just wonderful. The subject is so bright with a great feeling of motion. And, I had no idea that the very negative background could become such a great and integral part of your image. I have no suggestions. Thanks for sharing. |
Feb 8th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 18
|
78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Very nice image and great conversion from the original. In my revision I adjusted only the contrast and not the saturation. |
Feb 7th |
 |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
A very nice sharp image with very nice composition. My only suggestion is to brighten the center of the orchid. |
Feb 7th |
 |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
I agree with Sunil's suggestions - one catch light and a little darker on the right side. And, I wonder how the image would look if the background was not so dark - to make the hair stand out more. Great shot, great conversion. |
Feb 7th |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
To me it seems that there are two images - the road and the sky. And, again to me, it does not seem that they go together very well. So in my revision I cropped out the sky and some of the left side. And, it seems that the trees at the end of the road are slanting to the right so I straightened them and then I brightened the image. |
Feb 7th |
 |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Very interesting. Very creative. I would not change anything. Great shot! |
Feb 7th |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Thanks for the suggestion. I've toned my revised image with a sepia color. |
Feb 7th |
 |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Thanks for the suggestion. I agree that the object to the left of the shack is a distraction. So it took quite a while but I did remove it and replace it with a tree. The resulting image looks much better. |
Feb 7th |
 |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Sunil, thanks for the suggestion. Attached is my mono version in which I also removed the sign (or whatever it was) from the left side of the shack. |
Feb 7th |
 |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
I think your conversion is wonderful. The subject is sharp and the slightly blurred background enhances the subject. My suggestion is a crop that is not so tight to give more of a feeling of the environment and I feel it improves the composition. Also, I prefer to have the tree not so slanting as in revision. |
Feb 7th |
 |
78 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Mitch my understanding is that RAW image files contain unprocessed data from the camera's sensor whereas a JPEG image is created by compressing and discarding some of the original RAW data. Thus, a RAW file will contain up to six times more pixels than a JPEG file. A JPEG file is fine for snapshots and I believe news photographers shoot in JPEG. But, if you shoot in RAW you will have the maximum number of pixels available for processing your images. |
Feb 3rd |
6 comments - 4 replies for Group 78
|
13 comments - 5 replies Total
|