Activity for User 792 - Stuart Ord - stuart@CEDCS.com

Close this Tab when done

---

1083 Comments / 738 Replies Posted

= Current Round

= Previous Round

Group	Round	C/R	Comment	Date	Image
95	May 25	Comment	Yes, these little critters can scuttle about a lot, but as they rarely fly off, you are tempted to keep chasing them. Easier said than done with a miniscule depth of field. So you have lost focus on the far antenna and the top crescent of its back and head, but it matters not for an artistic photo I think. A nice result.	May 15th
95	May 25	Comment	I agree, it's the opposite of John's image and yet its simplicity gives it strength I think. Your depth of field is well chosen, although I'd have preferred the very top to be sharp as it's a point of interest, if you'd pardon the pun. Speaking of which, there is a small pointed detail at the very top. Is that something behind the subject? It seems out of place to me, I'd clone it out.	May 15th
95	May 25	Comment	There's lovely detail here, and a riot of colour that makes it interesting. I think the highlights (or maybe they are light patched on the flower) could do with darkening a bit, or cloned out. I would crop a bit off both sides as centre stage draws my attention the most.	May 15th
95	May 25	Comment	I've seen potato eyes many times of course, but never thought to photograph them! They make a good subject! I think your post processing has done a good job, and the stack has given good depth of field that suits the subject. I think it's a little dark, and lightening the eyes would make them stand out more and give more impact.	May 15th
95	May 25	Comment	I do like this. I'm struggling a little to see why you have a good depth of field, as the wing pointing towards us is all equally sharp as the body and far wing, given the camera settings. The more distant part of the flower is blurred as I'd expect. But who cares, it's a lovely result, nicely composed.	May 15th
95	May 25	Comment	Beautiful, well done. A UV torch has been on my shopping list for ages, the choice of what to buy I found to be overpowering so I flunked out. I wonder if the UV only illuminated the top part of the centre, as the lower part looks dark. Maybe it doesn't fluoresce the same way as the stigma does. Your choice of background could have been criticised for being too similar to the petals, to my non-imaginative way of thinking. But the outline is clear all round the flower, and the result is very calm and restful. It's not pin sharp, but again I think that must be deliberate as it makes it so soft. More, please!	May 15th
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 95
6 comments - 0 replies Total

---

189 Images Posted

= Current Round

= Previous Round

Group 06
Feb 20	Jan 20	Dec 19	Nov 19	Oct 19	Sep 19	Aug 19	Jul 19	Jun 19	May 19	Mar 19	Apr 19
Jan 19	Feb 19	Dec 18	Nov 18
Group 64
Dec 25	Nov 25	Oct 25	Sep 25	Aug 25	Jul 25	Jun 25	May 25	Apr 25	Mar 25	Feb 25	Jan 25
Dec 24	Nov 24	Oct 24	Sep 24	Aug 24	Jul 24	Jun 24	May 24	Apr 24	Mar 24	Feb 24	Jan 24
Dec 23	Nov 23	Oct 23	Sep 23	Aug 23	Jul 23	May 23	Apr 23	Mar 23	Feb 23	Jan 23	Dec 22
Nov 22	Oct 22	Sep 22	Aug 22	Jul 22	Jun 22	Apr 22	Mar 22	Feb 22	Jan 22	Dec 21	Nov 21
Oct 21	Sep 21	Aug 21	Jul 21	Jun 21	May 21	Apr 21	Mar 21	Feb 21	Jan 21	Dec 20	Nov 20
Oct 20	Sep 20	Aug 20	Jul 20	Jun 20	May 20	Apr 20	Mar 20	Feb 20	Jan 20	Dec 19	Nov 19
Oct 19	Sep 19	Aug 19	Jul 19	Jun 19	May 19	Apr 19	Mar 19	Feb 19	Jan 19	Dec 18	Nov 18
Oct 18	Sep 18	Aug 18	Jul 18	Jun 18	May 18	Apr 18	Mar 18	Feb 18	Jan 18	Dec 17	Nov 17
Oct 17	Sep 17	Aug 17	Jul 17	Jun 17	May 17	Apr 17	Mar 17
Group 95
Dec 25	Nov 25	Oct 25	Sep 25	Aug 25	Jul 25	Jun 25	May 25	Apr 25	Mar 25	Feb 25	Jan 25
Dec 24	Nov 24	Oct 24	Sep 24	Aug 24	Jul 24	Jun 24	May 24	Apr 24	Mar 24	Feb 24	Jan 24
Dec 23	Nov 23	Oct 23	Sep 23	Aug 23	Jul 23	Jun 23	May 23	Apr 23	Mar 23	Feb 23	Jan 23
Dec 22	Nov 22	Oct 22	Sep 22	Aug 22	Jul 22	Jun 22	May 22	Apr 22	Mar 22	Feb 22	Jan 22
Dec 21	Oct 21	Sep 21	Aug 21	Jul 21	Jun 21	May 21	Apr 21	Mar 21	Feb 21	Jan 21	Dec 20
Nov 20	Oct 20	Sep 20	Aug 20	Jul 20	Jun 20	May 20	Apr 20	Mar 20

Close this Tab when done