Activity for User 792 - Stuart Ord - stuart@CEDCS.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done


1111 Comments / 770 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
64 Apr 18 Reply Indeed you are. We've often thought about a trip to the USA, but it's such a big place with so many interesting (and widespread) areas. I can remember a time management tutorial that said "How do you eat an elephant? Answer - in small portions". Maybe we'll have to do that. This year however it's north Spain, south France and the good old UK in our motorhome. Apr 27th
64 Apr 18 Reply No telepathy of teleporation here!
I see your PTD dilemma. It's not a category I've come across, I guess it has editing limits like nature. But even definitions of "nature" seem to be softening with limited editing allowed No such allowance here?
Apr 27th
64 Apr 18 Comment Super, I like the idea and the result.
To me the focus of interest is the building front and balcony, so I'd get cropping, removing the sloped-roof building on the right, the darker area at the bottom, and a bit from the left for balance. That leaves the light areas to be toned down as suggested.
Apr 27th
64 Apr 18 Comment I agree with those comments. To me, a little more space on the right would be a good improvement. If you took a jpg in your camera, it will have been sharpened by default, but even so as John suggests, a bit more use of sharpening might have helped. It's easy to overdo that and once noticed, sharpening artifacts are definite no-no's. Apr 27th
64 Apr 18 Comment Yes, I agree with all of those comments, it's a lovely picture.
If I could just air my obsession, the small branch on the top left opposite the pipe (pole?) looks ripe for cloning out to me.... The pipes look like part of the building (albeit I don't know their purpose) so I'd leave them in.
Apr 27th
64 Apr 18 Comment Everything abstract is taken from some source I think, so personally I think anything, even a natural beauty, is a valid starting point. I certainly wouldn't have know the source without your explanation. You guys do have some great sources!
I agree with John and Jerry, the peaks look blown to me, and recovering some detail there would improve it. However it's a nice satisfying abstract.
Apr 27th
64 Apr 18 Comment Impact! You could use this image as a pictorial definition of the word, I think. I wonder why it put on that display if it is nesting? but I know nothing about egrets. I suppose I could say it's lacking in mid tones, but there are some mid tones there and the tone distribution is what gives it that impact. The sun is acting like a single spotlight, so maybe you need a side light, and a background light, and maybe a hair light..... but hey, that's nonsense, this is nature photography with attitude and I love it. Apr 27th
64 Apr 18 Comment One of the nice things about ths group is I get to learn a bit about America. Pemaquid was a word I didn't recognise, but now I know a bit about the many the lighthouses in Maine. Thanks for the pointer!
Back to the picture. Technically, all is super in my view, as usual, and a lovely picture. I've been debating with myself for some time as to whether I agree with the positive comments about the rocks. Generally here (I mean UK) a judge would condemn them for being a distraction on the periphery of the picture, detracting from the main subject. But I do agree with your comments, it does add balance. I do agree with cropping off some sky though, it doesn't add anything for me. This is leading me towards a letterbox crop, which actually I like as there's bags of interest in the buildings.
I know it's being really picky, but I don't like the flag crossing the chimney pot, but that sort of thing is so difficult to see at the moment of exposure. A lull in the wind would have helped.
Finally, the tree on the right edge. Some would say it forms a stopper to the eye drifting off to the right, whereas others would say it is another distraction on the edge. I think I would clone it out, as without it, the picture is more symmetrical and rounded.
Apr 27th

6 comments - 2 replies for Group 64


6 comments - 2 replies Total


197 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 06

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Mar 19

Apr 19

Jan 19

Feb 19

Dec 18

Nov 18
Group 64

Apr 26

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

Apr 22

Mar 22

Feb 22

Jan 22

Dec 21

Nov 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Apr 19

Mar 19

Feb 19

Jan 19

Dec 18

Nov 18

Oct 18

Sep 18

Aug 18

Jul 18

Jun 18

May 18

Apr 18

Mar 18

Feb 18

Jan 18

Dec 17

Nov 17

Oct 17

Sep 17

Aug 17

Jul 17

Jun 17

May 17

Apr 17

Mar 17
Group 95

Apr 26

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

May 22

Apr 22

Mar 22

Feb 22

Jan 22

Dec 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Close this Tab when done