Activity for User 792 - Stuart Ord - stuart@CEDCS.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done

1111 Comments / 770 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
64 Sep 17 Comment You are both right, it is a bit soft and has lost detail in the shadows. The reason I posted this one is because I've been doing Jon Fishback's course on image analysis (which I thought was very good), and when he presented a street photo for criticism, I judged it as a pictorial image. I was soon told that this was not appropriate! Jon sent me an introductory guide which I found most interesting, but I don't think I can upload it here. If you're interested please email me at stuart at cedcs dot com and I'll send it to you. Sep 22nd
64 Sep 17 Comment Absolutely great. Enlarging the image makes it pop even more and makes the beautiful structure clearer and more impressive. It will look great as a large, glossy print. Sep 14th
64 Sep 17 Comment My initial reaction to this image was "Wow, great". On reflection I agree with the comments, I'm sure it has been over-sharpened, and I don't think it needs it - lack of sharpness will highlight the dusty atmosphere. Sep 14th
64 Sep 17 Comment Strange how we all focus on that little bit of missing arch, isn't it? I'd like a shot with it complete, too. I'd also like to see the light detail at the top right (windows?) to be cloned out. Technically I think it's great. I quite like the lack of sharpness of the distant columns as it emphasises the sense of depth to me. Personally I don't mind noise in an image, so I happily use higher ISOs if needed, but I don't think it is here, the exposure combination is spot on for me. Sep 14th
64 Sep 17 Comment I think it's a punchy, dramatic image so I like the high contrast. However I also think that the very dark fence and its shadow spoil it. Sep 14th
64 Sep 17 Comment I agree with most of the above comments and like this image. I also particularly like the double waterfall. However that leads me not to like the branch in the centre top, which I feel distracts from the waterfall and overall composition. Personally I'd have excluded that branch and maybe had a little more at the top above the water to give a wider border. Sep 14th
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 64
6 comments - 0 replies Total

197 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 06

Feb 20
Jan 20
Dec 19
Nov 19
Oct 19
Sep 19
Aug 19
Jul 19
Jun 19
May 19
Mar 19
Apr 19

Jan 19
Feb 19
Dec 18
Nov 18
Group 64

Apr 26
Mar 26
Feb 26
Jan 26
Dec 25
Nov 25
Oct 25
Sep 25
Aug 25
Jul 25
Jun 25
May 25

Apr 25
Mar 25
Feb 25
Jan 25
Dec 24
Nov 24
Oct 24
Sep 24
Aug 24
Jul 24
Jun 24
May 24

Apr 24
Mar 24
Feb 24
Jan 24
Dec 23
Nov 23
Oct 23
Sep 23
Aug 23
Jul 23
May 23
Apr 23

Mar 23
Feb 23
Jan 23
Dec 22
Nov 22
Oct 22
Sep 22
Aug 22
Jul 22
Jun 22
Apr 22
Mar 22

Feb 22
Jan 22
Dec 21
Nov 21
Oct 21
Sep 21
Aug 21
Jul 21
Jun 21
May 21
Apr 21
Mar 21

Feb 21
Jan 21
Dec 20
Nov 20
Oct 20
Sep 20
Aug 20
Jul 20
Jun 20
May 20
Apr 20
Mar 20

Feb 20
Jan 20
Dec 19
Nov 19
Oct 19
Sep 19
Aug 19
Jul 19
Jun 19
May 19
Apr 19
Mar 19

Feb 19
Jan 19
Dec 18
Nov 18
Oct 18
Sep 18
Aug 18
Jul 18
Jun 18
May 18
Apr 18
Mar 18

Feb 18
Jan 18
Dec 17
Nov 17
Oct 17
Sep 17
Aug 17
Jul 17
Jun 17
May 17
Apr 17
Mar 17
Group 95

Apr 26
Mar 26
Feb 26
Jan 26
Dec 25
Nov 25
Oct 25
Sep 25
Aug 25
Jul 25
Jun 25
May 25

Apr 25
Mar 25
Feb 25
Jan 25
Dec 24
Nov 24
Oct 24
Sep 24
Aug 24
Jul 24
Jun 24
May 24

Apr 24
Mar 24
Feb 24
Jan 24
Dec 23
Nov 23
Oct 23
Sep 23
Aug 23
Jul 23
Jun 23
May 23

Apr 23
Mar 23
Feb 23
Jan 23
Dec 22
Nov 22
Oct 22
Sep 22
Aug 22
Jul 22
Jun 22
May 22

Apr 22
Mar 22
Feb 22
Jan 22
Dec 21
Oct 21
Sep 21
Aug 21
Jul 21
Jun 21
May 21
Apr 21

Mar 21
Feb 21
Jan 21
Dec 20
Nov 20
Oct 20
Sep 20
Aug 20
Jul 20
Jun 20
May 20
Apr 20

Mar 20

Close this Tab when done