|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 36 |
Feb 21 |
Reply |
Thank you, Larry :) |
Feb 14th |
| 36 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
A fantastic picture, Larry. I have never photographed the milky way, but now I have to try this out. I like the minimal composition creating the leading lines into the sky.
If I should give any comments, it would be to lower the contrast on the ground and the tree trunks and lighten the dark areas, so we could see some details. have you tried with lighten up areas with LED flashlights using multiple exposures? |
Feb 14th |
| 36 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
I like the composition with the curves moving inward in the image. I agree with the others about the tree trunk and in my opinion, the trunk is not the issue, but the ground around it. I would also enhance the curves in the river. Here is my suggestion in the attached picture. |
Feb 14th |
 |
| 36 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Your picture has a lot of drama. Changing the sky has become easy in PS, but to make it natural is still a challenge. In my opinion, you have succeeded rather well.
My comment is that the sky is taking too much attention from the castle which is the main object. I am not sure if it will work, but you could try to use the mask of the castle and invert it and then darken the original sky. Maybe you get some nice clouds that will give you the dramatic effect you are searching for? Converting to B&W is also an option to consider. |
Feb 14th |
| 36 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
|
Feb 14th |
 |
| 36 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
I like your picture. Like street photography, landscapes also have their decisive moments and you have captured this one very well.
I agree with the others about darkening the foreground, but I have gone a step further and given it a bluish tone. The reason for this is twofold; the middle mountains have a purple tone and I have enhanced this into the foreground. Second, the blue in the foreground makes symmetry to the sky besides giving a color contrast. |
Feb 14th |
| 36 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Thank you guys for your comments. I must admit that I was a bit too quick when submitting this picture and it was not up to my best standards. I will therefore resubmit a new version edited in Photoshop (in the previous I only used Lightroom)
Larry, the boulder is included to mark a foreground and to create depth into image.
I also forgot to include the camera settings:
ISO: 100, 1/100 sec., f/11, 35 mm. Handheld. |
Feb 8th |
 |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 36
|
| 74 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Thank you for your comment, Dick. The intention was to emphasize the monument and the building behind it since they have a connection. The surroundings are therefore toned down. But I see your point.
|
Feb 27th |
| 74 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Interesting composition with the very special rock formations in the foreground and the majestic mountains in the background. Under the circumstances, you have succeeded well with the sharpness and depth of field, even though the mountains are slightly soft. f/16 and a higher ISO might have solved this. |
Feb 9th |
| 74 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
An interesting shot where you have hit the decisive moment. It looks a bit surrealistic with the face mask and the painting behind.
The problem here, in my opinion, is that the painting takes too much attention from the girl. My suggestion is to darken the painting slightly and make more contrasts on the girl to make her pop. |
Feb 9th |
| 74 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
A well-composed picture. The side light creates nice shadows and enhances the structure in the snow. I also liked the shadow from the tree in the foreground.
I think I would crop from the top in order to make the two repeating forms clearer. |
Feb 9th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 74
|
10 comments - 1 reply Total
|