|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 5 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Mark, I agree with Jim's comments on the colored version. However, on B/W version, I am drawn to the model's left eye, is it possible to make it a little brighter and a little more defined? |
Apr 1st |
| 5 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
Thanks, Jim, I still hope to do some astrophotography in the future. A few members of our photography club had an outing planned last August but the weather was busy making other plans. Thanks for the information about "Sequator" too. |
Apr 1st |
| 5 |
Apr 24 |
Reply |
Thanks, Jim, I wish we had a hair light too but I will try to do a little more post-processing to get more separation. |
Apr 1st |
| 5 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Sophia, this was a great shot! You have done an excellent job in post-processing; you have detail in the shadows and the highlights. I see the texture of the rocks in the foreground. There is a black point and a white point and a good gradation between the two points; for me these are the elements of a good B/W photograph. Also, flipping the image was the right thing to do for this image, making the road go from right to left, which is more comfortable for most viewers. Well done! |
Apr 1st |
| 5 |
Apr 24 |
Comment |
Jim, this is an interesting shot; from what I understand about astrophotography, any exposure longer than 20 seconds will show movement because of the Earth's rotation. Obviously, from this image, I have a lot more to learn about astrophotography because I am not seeing the streaks of movement I would expect from this length of exposure. I do like the results. |
Apr 1st |
3 comments - 2 replies for Group 5
|
3 comments - 2 replies Total
|