|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Reply |
I think bird photography may be an act (among others) of juggling between higher and lower shutter speeds, depending on the situation (flight or stationary). No wonder it is challenging. |
May 24th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Mervyn,
I have the same lens. It is very good but very heavy. I might even crop in some more to remove some of the foreground. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Geoff,
Impressive geology. I agree that even though you didn't add any saturation this is one of those images where selectively reducing the saturation might help. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Brenda,
Good catch. When you expect or hope to catch a bird in flight, the shutter speed will have to be higher - 1/2000 or more to get more sharp images of the wings. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Jacob,
I like the subject and have no additional suggestions. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Yes, shawdows are a bit too dark for me too. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Yes, shawdows are a bit too dark for me too. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Yes, shawdows are a bit too dark for me too. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Pierre,
Lovely colorful small bird and flower combination. I find the upper branch a bit distracting but it also serves as a frame. I don't know if cropping it out would be an improvement. See attached. |
May 14th |
 |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Mervyn. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Reply |
Yes, it is good that hummingbirds actually hover for brief periods; otherwise it would be nearly impossible to catch them in flight. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Candy. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Reply |
Yes, easy enough to lighten it up. Thanks. |
May 14th |
| 69 |
May 22 |
Reply |
Brenda,
This was just an unanticipated hummingbird which happened to find the one flowering bush that was near the blind. |
May 14th |
8 comments - 6 replies for Group 69
|
8 comments - 6 replies Total
|