|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Geoff. |
Feb 12th |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Candy.
|
Feb 10th |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Mervyn.
|
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Pierre. I didn't know what the ducks were. |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Yes, sometimes they just seem to wander around. I mentioned Brenda because she indicated ducks. I think geese prefer to poop on people's docks and lakeside docks. That's my experience living on a large lake in Michigan. |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Actually, I have decided to give up on that image. I think this one is more interesting? |
Feb 2nd |
 |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Brenda,
I think you would have to crop in more for me to be able to me to begin to make some visual sense of this image. Of course, your explanation helps but visually it is difficult to discern a clear subject. |
Feb 2nd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Congratulations on getting down that low; I hope you made it back up OK.) The underside is often the most interesting portion of these mushrooms. |
Feb 2nd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Pierre,
Aren't these all geese (Brenda?). Geese on the ground are not the most compelling of subjects but there is a some interest with the assortment and diagonal ice/water line. |
Feb 2nd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Candy,
I might crop in - their eyes are usually quite compelling and that bit of unexpected weed would provide even greater impact. |
Feb 2nd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Geoff,
I agree with Brenda. The aft portions of the bird seem bit soft and the lily flowers, while providing context, also appear distracting. Too much complexity to my eye. |
Feb 2nd |
| 69 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Brenda,
Revised per suggestions. Not much detail to work with on top of wings but a little. |
Feb 2nd |
 |
4 comments - 8 replies for Group 69
|
4 comments - 8 replies Total
|