|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Jacob. |
Jun 26th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Improved; no other suggestions. |
Jun 25th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Pierre. |
Jun 23rd |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Geoff,
I am always impressed when someone is able to capture a clear image of a bird in flight - I expect 1/2000 helps a lot to do that. I am not bothered by the direction of flight. No everyone reads left to right. Good image. |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Brenda,
I agree with Mervyn - I would crop a bit down from the top and get rid of the intruding branch (if not for PSA judging). |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Jacob,
Yes, I agree that the post processing, particularly the saturation and the heavy vignette, is a bit too much. I think the original background would be OK if it could be blurred a bit and darkened just a tad. |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Candy,
One eyed portraits in people are usually not attractive but maybe with birds there is a bit more leeway? |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Pierre,
I agree, unless submitting to PSA, I would remove the stick in front and, regardless, lighten the eye area a bit (although I doubt that it can be lightened much because it is dark). |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Mervyn,
Great catch with the two chicks mirroring one another. This one could definitely be contest material. |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Geoff. |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Candy. |
Jun 8th |
| 69 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Brenda,
In the old days, the slowest shutter speed for handheld was generally recommended to be 1/60. With modern cameras with shake reduction mechanisms, it is possible to go a go bit slower (as you know, I expect). Usually though, I would use a tripod -- I just didn't want to drag it around on my hike in the woods.
Everything is getting very green now, although we really need some rain. |
Jun 8th |
6 comments - 6 replies for Group 69
|
6 comments - 6 replies Total
|