|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 31 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Hi, Ella!
Lovely shot. Very close and very nice. I miss the tone gradation in the image. From my point of view everything looks a little halftone and grayish. |
Mar 22nd |
| 31 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Hi, Paul!
Very cool! My view goes directly to the animal's eyes. Leopard is in so relaxed state. Excellent animal portrait in natural environment. Image creates a sense of presence. |
Mar 22nd |
| 31 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Hi, John!
I'm not a great expert on landscape photography. From my point of view in this picture all the attention picks up the sky. The sky is very powerful. But in the sky something is missing for me. Maybe a group of seagulls flying would be the very good point of atractions. |
Mar 22nd |
| 31 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Hi, Ian!
I like the "image of character" in the portrait. About hands we have already discussed. Nothing to add. I am also confused by postprocessing. Too contrast from my point of view, the feeling that this is a graphic illustration and not a photograph.
"The background was not good as can be seen..."
I think that the best course to make a good background on the site, not to count for processing. This is a very time-consuming.
|
Mar 22nd |
| 31 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Hi, Peter!
Great, nothing to add. A really great scape with multiplane compo. White cross on chirch - punctum for me. Thank you! |
Mar 19th |
| 31 |
Mar 17 |
Reply |
Hi, Ella!
Thank you for review. I added in the reply comment fot Ian another version of my image, taking into account your and Ian remarks. |
Mar 15th |
| 31 |
Mar 17 |
Reply |
Hi, Ian! Thank you for review. I removed the object in the background. I can not pinpoint, it became better or not. )))
It seems like a distracting bright object has left. But on the other hand, the object on third plan lost. Probably got better. I hope the rest of colleagues will also express their opinion. |
Mar 15th |
 |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 31
|
5 comments - 2 replies Total
|
