|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 84 |
Feb 22 |
Reply |
Bunny,
Thank you very much for your suggestions! I think you exactly pointed out the weakness of this video. It was because when I initially edited in timeline, I didn't think I would put so much scrips, so I cut the clips vert short and did not leave enough duration for words to be add in. I will take into account in future editing. |
Jan 30th |
| 84 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Bunny,
1. Quality results with AI software for the better resolution (my first time heard of that, will try later)
2. Very nice personalized opening logo
3. Quick changing clips with music beats (0:51-0:52, 1:36-1:37, 2:23-2:24) (I really like that and will try in my future video)
4. Short clips used throughout to attract viewers' attention
Suggestion: If adding some transitions between clips |
Jan 30th |
| 84 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Harry,
1. Very nice time-lapse (1:24-1:27, 1:39-1:42, 2:37-2:42, 2:42-2:51)
2. Very steady drone footage (2:17-2:22, 2:33-2:36)
3. Music matches the video content very well
4. Great still images
Suggestion: No motion blur on the blades of wind turbines (2:37-2:42). If you pause the video, the blades look too sharp on the image. I guess it was shot with time lapse auto settings. I would switch auto to manual, and reset the exposure by following 180Â shutter rule. They will spin with enough motion blurring as real. |
Jan 30th |
| 84 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Helen,
1. Very nice time-lapse at the opening
2. Great still images
3. Wave-like-transitions between clips (I really like them)
4. Suggestion: The ending is kind of sudden. If there is a few seconds to fade off. I agree with Bunny's suggestion. |
Jan 30th |
| 84 |
Feb 22 |
Comment |
Dick,
1. Very nice and steady aerial footage over the lake with smooth movement
2. Music matches the video content very well
3. At the ending camera slowly approaching and closing up to the videographer
4. Suggestion: If cut and separate the quick-turn-footages (1:28-1:31, 5:38-5:45, 6:09- 6:12, 7:37-7:42) with their slowing parts and reduce their speed to match the main parts at post editing, it may present better result.
I also agree with Bunny "If you add a few cuts or some B-roll, you can easily remove these (unwanted) elements." |
Jan 30th |
4 comments - 1 reply for Group 84
|
4 comments - 1 reply Total
|
