|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Emil
Always look forward to having different views, and your version is another example. This is what makes our group 'GREAT'. So, thank you. |
Feb 6th |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Much better, Melanie. Thanks for showing. |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Hi Henry
Thanks for your observation/suggestion. Will do that when editing the image again.
|
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Hi Melanie
Thanks for your comments. I also like your edited version. Will certainly keep that in mind. |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Looks lovely. |
Feb 3rd |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Henry
Beautifully composed and processed. Everything is going for the image and like the inclusion of the foreground grasses. Soft nature also suits the image. Well done!
Having said that, I attempted to increase the contrast a little to see what you think!! |
Feb 3rd |
 |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Hi Gary
I like what you have done to the image by way of adding Mystic filter. It looks so much better. Will try and re-edit the image myself. Thanks also for the suggested titles. |
Feb 2nd |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Thanks Jack, for the alternative suggestion. Always nice having another idea/approach on composition. |
Feb 1st |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Reply |
Thanks Arik. |
Feb 1st |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Emil
I like the way you've handled the trees and their separation. I couldn't have done any better. Your post-processing is equally good and has all the qualities of an IR image. By the same token, I also like Airk's interpretation. |
Feb 1st |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Melanie
You've done a great job by way of composition and processing. However, I agree with Jack in terms of adding a bit of drama in bringing out more tones in clouds.
|
Feb 1st |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Gary
Your creativity is AWESOME!! Shows what can be achieved with modern tools in making something extraordinary from an otherwise (badly) underexposed slide. Having said that, I wondered if the image will look even better with slightly reduced saturation in red. Just a humble opinion! |
Feb 1st |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Charles
I agree with both Arik and Jack, but would have preferred a bit more detail in clouds. A nice image, nonetheless. |
Feb 1st |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Jack
What a splendid shot of the bridge, keeping everything in perspective. Compositionally, well handled. The two cars running in opposite direction is a bonus. On a minor point though, the verticals need slight adjustment, which can be easily done. |
Feb 1st |
| 66 |
Feb 23 |
Comment |
Hi Arik
A busy scene which you've captured and executed so well. Composition, framing, tones, etc., add to the beauty. Like it lots. 10/10. |
Feb 1st |
9 comments - 6 replies for Group 66
|
9 comments - 6 replies Total
|