|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 50 |
Jun 17 |
Reply |
Unfortunately the image is a composite and so ineligible for Photojournalism. The centre rider has been added. See original |
Jun 22nd |
 |
| 50 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
I have waited a while before commenting on this image to see if it grew on me with time. Technically as always with your images this is excellent. However the picture itself does very little for me, there is no centre of interest and my eye wanders around the picture but it doesn't settle anywhere. I would be interested to see how it performed in competitions. |
Jun 22nd |
| 50 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
I think it is an ideal image for mono. I suspect the colour version would have distracted from the fire fighter. I agree with Cindy about the cropping.The firefighter is positioned well in the frame both in your original and Cindy's cropped version. A pleasing portrait. |
Jun 14th |
| 50 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
I like this image especially the cloud reflections on the building. I would agree with Cindy about the contrast in the sky. |
Jun 14th |
| 50 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
I agree that this image is ideal for mono. I think you have cropped it a little tight on the LHS - I would kept the whole of the "stairway". Try reducing the detail in the sky as Paul suggested by using the blur filter, see which version you prefer and if you like the original then keep it. I think it is a matter of taste |
Jun 14th |
| 50 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
I agree with previous comments. |
Jun 14th |
| 50 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
I prefer the mono to the colour. I agree with Cindy about the lack of details in the flower but I agree that you do not want the background showing. In my version I have used levels to darken the background and then used various sharpening tools to try to bring more detail into the flower. This was my third version and I don't know if it is any better than your original |
Jun 14th |
 |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 50
|
6 comments - 1 reply Total
|