|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Thanks, Bill. I'll have to give it a try. |
Dec 24th |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Nan, I see you are in agreement to darken the trail in the foreground. Thanks. |
Dec 9th |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Larry, thanks for the compliment for the photo. I'll have to try your idea of using a linear gradient to darken the foreground and subtley lead the eye to the peak. |
Dec 9th |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Barbara, you Arne and Michael have all agreed I need to darken the road, a bit. I will have to see what that does. Thanks! |
Dec 9th |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Michael, I'll have to try darkening the road, a bit. |
Dec 9th |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
|
Dec 7th |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Great picture. It catches the viewers eye with the beautiful colors of the bridge. The red leads the viewers eye into picture. It may need to be tonned down alittle . |
Dec 7th |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Barbara,I like it. I am in the process of doing the same with my telephoto lens to see if I can direct the viewers eye toward a specific point. I liked the composition of the moon just easing over the trees. |
Dec 3rd |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Bill, this is a great photo of the falls, and it shows with all of the work you did to make an ordinary photo turn into a really, really nice compositon. |
Dec 3rd |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Arne, this is a very nice photo of the church. My only comment is I would have eliminated the wall completely as I found it confusing. I had to look back to your original to see what it was. I belive I would have cropped it completely out. I also might have lighten the road so that it guided the viewers eyes toward the church in a slow curve toward the church. |
Dec 3rd |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Michael, I understand the huffing and puffing experience as I have been there many times. Was the wind in the storm you were in 141 MPH? If so, what were you holding on to keep from flying. I really like what you have done with this photo of using Black and White. I hadn't thought of using Black and White, but now I'll have too as I really like what you have done. |
Dec 3rd |
| 36 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Larry you do have an eye for the unusual. The building is the first thing I saw in the photo, but then the grasses become the focal point. Using the PhotoPIlls calculator worked well for you. I noticed you were able to shot the building without the branches of the tree being on the front. Nice work. |
Dec 3rd |
8 comments - 4 replies for Group 36
|
| 46 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Paul, I must have been there when you were, my pictures of the falls shows them being bone dry. You have good detail in the picture. I find the tree at the middle bottom to be distracting. You might think of cloning it out. Also I might suggest a 16x9 would work really well with this photo. |
Dec 12th |
| 46 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Tom, sorry I can not transport. I suggest you go to Utah, there are wonderful parks there, and each is different and worth your time. |
Dec 9th |
| 46 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Don, I like this shotof the waterfall and the pond. I believe you setting of 1/30 was a bit too long as the falls are too full of water. I would suggest you use 1/8 to 1/4 to get the water flowing just right. |
Dec 4th |
| 46 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Don, I like your piece of history. You did a really go job of getting rid of the weeds and cloning them out. The composition was nicely done and the clouds against the green grass sets up a nice view of the building. Good detail. |
Dec 4th |
3 comments - 1 reply for Group 46
|
11 comments - 5 replies Total
|