|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Arne, Great shot! By going to BW you added drama to the picture. I like the picture the way it is as I can see more of what's around the geyser. However the square would direct the viewers eye only to the water spray. |
Jul 10th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Bill, I like this photo, colors are more realistic. |
Jul 9th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Steven, yes. |
Jul 6th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Larry, in order to have the complete towers required a lot of sky. I felt it was more important to show the complete towers, rather than crop out the sky. It was a rainy day and the clouds were something I just had to leave in the photo. See cropped photo below. |
Jul 6th |
 |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Bill, again, another reason for me to go back to the Grand Canyon. I find the photo over saturated, especially the clouds. I took your original and worked on it. Here is my rendition. Not sure it's much better. You decide. |
Jul 6th |
 |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
George, I like this picture of a city canyon. Nicely done. I would agree with Michael and Larry to remove the vertical lines of blue and gold on the side. Cropping out the grass was a good move. It would have been distracting. |
Jul 6th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Michael, not much, not any additions I could add to what Larry said. This is an outstanding photo. Everything is in it's place and it shows you took your time to compose the photo. Nice history of the Shaker's community. |
Jul 6th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Larry, you do have a way with words in describing your photo. I enjoyed your comments and the way you took the photo. I believe, it does exactly what you were attempting to get, a look of gone. Nicely done. |
Jul 6th |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 36
|
| 46 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Opps, Don this shot wasn't bracketed. That was for photo in Group 46 HDR. |
Jul 11th |
| 46 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
You might send it to Paul, and see if he can add it. |
Jul 10th |
| 46 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Don, it was a bracketed photo. I've asked Paul to include them. |
Jul 10th |
| 46 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Yes |
Jul 9th |
| 46 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Ron, sorry to hear about the weather and the rain. However, your photos of the bridge is very well done. I especially like that you decided to take out one of the supports, which brings out the other columns. Only thing I would suggest is you rework the clouds as I found them a little harsh. All-in-all a very nice piece of work. Were you able to get back to the park after the sun came out? |
Jul 6th |
| 46 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Paul, this is a good example of what HDR can do in bringing out the best of each. Good detail in Half Doom, and the trees below. Nicely done. |
Jul 6th |
| 46 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Don, I really liked this photo, especially with the woman on the front porch, which add to feeling of the image. Really liked the detail you brought out in the trees, building, etc. Only suggestion I have is I believe the green in the trees should be closer to the color in photo two. |
Jul 6th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 46
|
| 96 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Robert, Larry, I REALLY like this photo and both of your comments regarding it. I thought about it and I modified the photo to show less which translates into more. Let me know what you thing of the adjusted photo. Robert I know you wanted to show all three falls, but like Larry said, Where does the viewers eye settle to get the full impact. |
Jul 11th |
 |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 96
|
12 comments - 4 replies Total
|