|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 9 |
Jul 17 |
Reply |
Yes I do understand your comment about the space on the right. The original shot was wider and this is about as far a crop I could do without starting to lose detail in the birds. |
Jul 24th |
| 9 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
Very nice image of the northern lights. I like the placement of the mountains to the lights. I do feel that the mountain edges would be better if you soften them a few pixels. |
Jul 24th |
| 9 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
To my eye the background and foreground are too busy distracting me from the focus point of the image. I also feel that the growth is to overly processed. |
Jul 24th |
| 9 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
I feel you did a nice job with a p&s camera. Good processing of the sky. To my eye would have been nice, if possible, to have included the edges of the fountain and cropped out more of the water in the foreground. The lamppost could also be removed. |
Jul 24th |
| 9 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
A nice image with the interaction of the mother duck and ducklings. I feel you did a nice job bringing the intensity of the water down. Agree with Dave about the masking. |
Jul 24th |
| 9 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
Very nice portrait of a limpkin. Nice blurred background to bring it out. In my opinion it does seem to be a bit soft focused in the eye area where it should be the sharpest. |
Jul 24th |
| 9 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
I feel that you did a good job in bringing out the tonal values and textures in the building itself. To my eye the building to the left is just in the way. Yes if possible more room on the foreground would have been nice. |
Jul 24th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 9
|
6 comments - 1 reply Total
|