|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 13 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Steps are truly everyday things!
I like what you captured and think that I like Pat's mono version too!
I always enjoy architectural elements, especially strong lines, in mono. |
Oct 19th |
| 13 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Wow! This is a great shot! Very sharp, great color balance and interest. Super composition ... has it all! |
Oct 19th |
| 13 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Great photo and concept!
I was drawn right in and had to keep going back to spend time looking around. Applause! |
Oct 19th |
| 13 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Wow! Love this!
I wish I could see this everyday but they don't visit in my neck of the woods. |
Oct 19th |
| 13 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Yes, it certainly is "every day" every where! |
Oct 19th |
| 13 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
Great description Tim! The ironic thing is that the "lady" is a professional photographer and her husband is the "hobby hubby".
They are friends of mine and she didn't want to bring one of her many BIG cameras on our beach walk, lol! |
Oct 19th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 13
|
| 50 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
I like how you caught the train right at the sign. This photo tells a great story! |
Oct 19th |
| 50 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
As always, Cindy, you have a great eye!
I'm always torn between a naturalistic look and one that looks more HDR "like" which this photo falls more into.
One of my thoughts is that I don't know where you want me to focus... Maybe there isn't one focal point of interest? The clouds are wonderful and the mountains are nice relief against them. But then I'm pulled to the high contrast areas in the lower third so the picture bounces me around quite a bit.
I played a bit and offer another choice.
I echo Davids congrats!
|
Oct 19th |
 |
| 50 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Agree with all that's been said although I think you deliberately wanted it grainy, didn't you?
My only suggestion is to change the vignette to dark instead of white. The white edges compete with cute Violet.
And I agree with Chuck about cell phones pictures... they do a great job and I use mine often. |
Oct 19th |
| 50 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Both versions are quite striking and interesting.
I love the soft colors in the original, especially in the water.
The mono version is a bit busy in the trees and almost looks like a linocut. I'd prefer a bit less activity in the trees to help my eye rest on the water. |
Oct 19th |
| 50 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Love your treatment and texture of this compelling portrait!
It's so much more interesting than the color version in that you really pulled out more character in the mono. |
Oct 19th |
| 50 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Beautiful waterfall Paul!
I really like the mono version but there's so much competing for my eye in the details of the rock that it pulls me away from the lovely water shape.
I, too, played with it to soften the rocks and bring out the falls a bit more.
All the versions are good, it's just want every you like! |
Oct 19th |
 |
| 50 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
Thanks Chuck! A great suggestion! |
Oct 2nd |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 50
|
| 56 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
I agree with Cyril about your pleasing composition.
I had to look at the original, read your description and look closely back at your painted photo to understand what you did although I'm not sure what effect your going for.
It's a bit subtle for me but then it's all personal taste. I do think you can add more depth and texture to your photo to give it a bit more impact by doing some dodging and burning in select places. |
Oct 19th |
| 56 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
I really like this interpretation of your original photo Nancy!
Love the tone, the color, the elimination of the road, the positioning of the buggy... it all works! |
Oct 19th |
| 56 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Wow, what a wild treatment. You have great imagination and do a great job translating a standard portrait into something fun! |
Oct 19th |
| 56 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Lovely dreamy photo and painting. My eye easily follows the river through the picture.
Nice job! |
Oct 19th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 56
|
15 comments - 2 replies Total
|
