|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 68 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Nick, I have found that it is very difficult to merge two 3D objects to produce a 3D image that is natural looking. The element that looks like vertibrae appears to be buried under the astroturf with a channel dug out below. You might try to place the two images so that they intersect the other image to produce a phantogram (which is what this would be.
I would suggest that you use StereoPhotoMaker to make a "Pop-Up" using the two images to make an anaglyphic print.
An important tool in making phantogram is red/cyan glasses that can be bought from Berezin or other 3D vendors.
John |
Feb 18th |
| 68 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I have some limited experience with lenticular prints, but without seeing the finished product, it's hard to critique. That said, the 3D image that you attached is beautifully done, and I'm sure that it looks great.
John Ballou |
Feb 18th |
| 68 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Hi, Signe - I flipped the image and re-aligned it so that it would look ore natural - This meant that there is a slight loss of resolution, but to me it looks more natural.
Good work in a challenging situation.
John |
Feb 18th |
| 68 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Hello, Mohan - you did a great job formatting this and restricting the depth of the 3D effect, making the image appear natural, sharp and clear. I also like the inclusion of the bloom that is just about to unfold, giving the whole image a sense of the passage of time. |
Feb 18th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 68
|
4 comments - 0 replies Total
|