|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Henry. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Arik. Agree with your comment. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank you Palli |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Thank Jack. The tonality was difficult. I could have done better. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Reply |
Good point Gary. Thank you |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Henry, A very simple subject with all the right ingredients. Shows IR so well. The shadows give depth. May I suggest a white stroke around it. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Emil, it seems to me that you have really achieved your aim here. The fountain stands out from your mystical background Just a small thing, but I like how the central tree truck is placed between wings. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Palli, it seems we are all in agreement with processing. You really know how to finish your images. Well done. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Gary, You never cease to amaze. I can't imagine the difficulties of using IR film. We are digitally spoilt! The tones are entirely in keeping with the subject. I'm bother by the tree behind the car. There loss of detail which appears in the original. Maybe a little less contrast.
|
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Chuck, This is a beautifully captured scene. While our IR eyes want white foliage, it's not always possible. The framing really works. I wonder if you can find more detail in the bridge. I would brighten it. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Jack, what an interesting perspective The tree canopy really makes the image. I Would also add some canvas on the right Contrast will only make it better. |
Aug 6th |
| 66 |
Aug 24 |
Comment |
Hi Arik, I'm really enjoying your image this month. I would not crop the foreground. To me it balances the beautiful clouds. The color rendering is so well done. Just for fun, I wonder how you would like it if it was brightened. This would give more detail in the blacks. |
Aug 6th |
7 comments - 5 replies for Group 66
|
7 comments - 5 replies Total
|