|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 65 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Dick. Your comments are always appreciated. Original light was natural. I used screen in the history brush to lighten the center. Maybe too much? |
Feb 17th |
| 65 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Barbara. I will increase the yellows. Good idea. |
Feb 17th |
| 65 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Hi Maria, The water drops makes this pop. Good work on enhancing the color. great image, well done. |
Feb 17th |
| 65 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Hi Barbara, I do like this close up approach., and do not need to see the entire flower. I does seem that it should be shown as a vertical rotated 90 degrees clockwise. Colors are great. Maybe brighter in the center. |
Feb 17th |
| 65 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Hi Dick, Tulips are a favorite for photography. They always look so good. The arrangement is most pleasing. Lighting is great and the background complementary. I do find it a tad too saturated for my taste. |
Feb 17th |
3 comments - 2 replies for Group 65
|
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Deb, I appreciate the visit and kind words |
Feb 25th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Chuck, I agree that the view of the heron presents some problems |
Feb 25th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Thank you so much Emil |
Feb 25th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Thank you all for your lovely critic. I'm pleased that you liked it |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Henry, After my initial shock at the very bright colorful IR, I took in the lovely composition and think that everything belongs in the picture. The hills balance with the building. I really like the bright blue with the gentle clouds. Fantastic detail. I do wonder how it would look with a more yellow tone for the grasses? |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Emil, Ideal for IR. I love how details come out in architectural images. The tree give great balance and will be perfect after your fix. It's beautiful. |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Palli, What a wonderful spot. It all works. the placement with the front wheel turned out gives depth. The L tells the story. But the way you have processed makes it POP! |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Gary, You show a dramatic and ominous image. Perfect processing for a graveyard. The noise has been addressed, but I wonder if slightly less dramatic clouds would still work. I think that would allow the central tree to show more prominently. |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Chuck, well seen, well photographed and certainly well processed. Well done. |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Jack, I don't mind the highlights in the trees. It shows the IR well. I do think that the ruins need more contrast as suggested. A crop to the trees would make for a stronger composition in my eyes but that is a personal preference. |
Feb 4th |
| 66 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Arik, I think your dog should be getting credit for these walk pictures. At least a treat!
The light catching on the foreground grasses makes this image for me. The bare tree shapes makes a lovely canopy to infinity. |
Feb 4th |
8 comments - 3 replies for Group 66
|
11 comments - 5 replies Total
|