Activity for User 650 - Melanie Hurwitz - mbhurwitz55@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done


770 Comments / 381 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
66 Mar 21 Reply Thanks Jack, This looks great Mar 7th
66 Mar 21 Reply Thanks Gary, I does work. I'm thinking that the sky could certainly use the punch, and maybe leave the water as is, but vignette a little more. Mar 7th
66 Mar 21 Reply Palli and Jack, Thanks for showing a different version. I do agree that it is a much stronger version of the tree. I did record that tree often at different times of the day with all kinds of compositions. This time, I did want to show a wide view which probably reminds me of the time and place and not unexpectedly, is not shared by my viewers. Mar 7th
66 Mar 21 Comment Hi Jack, It's simple, it's clean and has your signature all over it. It's one of those "I wish I had seen this" images. The diagonal lines in the gorgeous sky seems to make it lean even more. Mar 7th
66 Mar 21 Comment Hi Chuck, A really cool scene, well captured. Ah that tree! I think your idea of content aware is what it needs. I don't think that just cropping it out works, as the tree framing really adds to the image. I would like to see more contrast in the water to show off the reflections and separate it from the surrounding foliage. I also seems that there is even more detail to be found in those interesting clouds. Mar 7th
66 Mar 21 Comment Hi Gary, your wonderful eye saw that the was a picture to be had, even if you did not record it perfectly. Conversion and tones are as usual lovely. I have been bothered by the leaf on the right, even though you faded it away. Took it into Photoshop to see what it looked like after removing it. Once there, I cropped it too, as it looked even stronger with about half the sky make a more panorama view. Wondering what you think? Mar 7th
66 Mar 21 Comment Hi Palli, Your favored blue tint works well here. I like that you cropped to offset it, but think that the clouds are more interesting on the right side, so I would have placed the lighthouse more to the left. I am wondering about your original, as there is water shown in your final. If you did add it, it was a good idea. Mar 7th
66 Mar 21 Comment Hi Emil, This is beautifully composed and shows the bridge to it best advantage. Generally your conversion is good. I did try some detail extractor and found it to be too crunchy as you thought. I really like the sky and would not like to see changes there. So my thought is that there is happy ground somewhere between what you show and Gary's version. I do agree on the small structure removal as others have noted. Mar 7th

5 comments - 3 replies for Group 66


5 comments - 3 replies Total


126 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 65

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22
Group 66

Apr 26

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

May 22

Apr 22

Mar 22

Feb 22

Jan 22

Dec 21

Nov 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Apr 19

Mar 19

Feb 19

Jan 19

Dec 18

Nov 18

Oct 18

Sep 18

Aug 18

Jul 18

Jun 18

Apr 18

Mar 18

Feb 18

Jan 18

Dec 17

Nov 17

Oct 17

Sep 17

Aug 17

Jul 17

Jun 17

May 17

Apr 17

Mar 17

Feb 17

Jan 17

Close this Tab when done