|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 35 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
Normally I like how you treat color in your images but this one, for me, the color does not work. The crypt and the tombstones in the foreground are so strong that the addition of the color trees are not worthwhile. I'd like to see a straight b/w IR rendition as the trees would be more of a compliment than a diversion. |
Mar 14th |
| 35 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
You were fortunate that the busy background didn't compete with the statue. The statue is quite interesting and does get our full attention. Just showing the upper part is fine as there is so much to look at. |
Mar 14th |
| 35 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
It is a beautiful bridge and your viewpoint, to me, is better than if you were at the water's edge - getting muddy boots! I like that you toned it as it does make it look old. Even though everything in the scene is the same tonality the bridge because of it structure stands out, as it should. |
Mar 14th |
| 35 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
The "house" is very unusual and worthy of a picture. My first thought was that it was a house designed by a committee! Until one reads the write-up the viewer doesn't know just how big the building is as it could be normal size. Because of the IR, it stands out against the tree in the background so there isn't anything else to draw attention away from the structure. You did a good job in eliminating whatever it is on the right edge in the original. I like it because of the novelty of the building. |
Mar 14th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 35
|
4 comments - 0 replies Total
|