|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 24 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Thanks, everyone. I've been struggling with this picture. I wanted to makae he lions the central subject but also I wanted to give a sense of place--especially the harshness of and expansiveness of their particular territory, which was without any green and just some kind of brush. How could I improve the negative space without crfeating a distraction? I agree with Gaetan's comment about the saturation of the lion's mane, |
May 25th |
| 24 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Beautifully done. I wish to could have taken it from a vantage point which would have allowed you to exclude so much of the lower left corner. |
May 9th |
| 24 |
May 22 |
Comment |
I think Jim's suggestion improves the tones and the excessively bright sun. Harbor photos are hard. I think the composition just doesn't work here. The trees and all those docked boats are just not interesting and what we have is a spectacular sky. I almost never even photograph sunsets, unless there is something particularly interesting to give a strong foreground. What mght work would be to use a very wide angle lens and get very close to the near boat |
May 9th |
| 24 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Very nicely done. I would crop the bottom up to the three piles of vegetation around the bird. The waterline seems to me to be the functional equivalent of a horizon which splits the scene in half and makes the composition a bit static. I think the grouping of the three piles and the bird would be more interesing. |
May 9th |
| 24 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Your creativity, courage and patience is amazing. How long did you spend on the whole project. The result is really interesting and very beautiful. I wouldn't darken the sparks. The house etc is hardly noticeable. In fact the suggestion of color breaks up what might otherwise be just too much black. |
May 9th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 24
|
| 47 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Ed: I meant to say I would be surprised if there were NOT sharp disagreement. |
May 22nd |
| 47 |
May 22 |
Comment |
This is well done, Ed. I do think Jeff and Bob have a good point about the contrast and tone. I agree tht the blacks are a bit week. I would be surprised if there were sharp disagreement with my next comment: I think there is too much that is unimportant. I would crop the top even to the penultimate distant arch in the ceiling. Thei mpact of the photo is result of the the people, the busts and the thousands of books The ceiling I feel doesn't add enough to be amajor element in the photo |
May 19th |
| 47 |
May 22 |
Comment |
Hi Kirsti,
I couldn't make up my mind which I liked better. The original needs some cropping of the snow. Both are really good cat pictures. the original--I feel it is about the cat; your final version is about the smile. The first has me wondering, why is the cat lying with its eyes closed? I wouldn't have thought of the smile, but for your final picture. The final just made me smile and never until I read your comment did I wonder why the smile. |
May 19th |
3 comments - 0 replies for Group 47
|
8 comments - 0 replies Total
|