|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 24 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
Beautiful |
Sep 14th |
| 24 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
This is a beautiful photograph. I would crop half of the brightly lit vegetation above the falls. On my computer the shadows look just right. |
Sep 13th |
| 24 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
Well done. The clouds are really interesting and actually echo the lines of the surfer's arm and shoulders. The color is very good. |
Sep 13th |
| 24 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
I think the re-edit really handles the poblems that others have discussed. The composition makes me want to see more of the environment |
Sep 13th |
| 24 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
It's a church or chapel, festooned with signal flags. I did what I could with levels and curves to get some detail in the dark rocky coast. Unfortjunately my D800 hadn't been invented. Slides just didn't have the ability to handles very high contrast scenes (or at least I didn't have the ability) |
Sep 13th |
| 24 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
This really wonderful. The merger of the faces and hands is a problem that I think might be partially addressed by very slightly increasing the contrast and the sharpening of the area. thsat might just give some separation. |
Sep 13th |
| 24 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
Fantastic shot. The aura's are caused by the camera and can be removed without disqualifying the phot. The is quite specific about cloning out imperfections caused by the equipment. I would not desaturate the yellow beak and clawsof the eagle. I don't see yellow other than the sunlight reflecting off the leading edge of the eagle's wings. I like it the it is. |
Sep 13th |
7 comments - 0 replies for Group 24
|
| 47 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
Thank you all for your comments. I'm not sure how to make the pebbles backgrund less distracting without doinht that wil be an obvious edit and unnatural. |
Sep 19th |
| 47 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
I like the haze that almost obscures the plateau in the background. I would crop the top to thetop of the plateau. The bright featureless sky above the plateau is a distration and complicates the image. I would crop The left at least to the beginning of the small rise in the mid-background or even more, perhaps to move the people off center. The sky in right needs to have some features, but nothing dramatic. Perhaps you could clone and paste the clouds |
Sep 13th |
| 47 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
This is a good start. Technically it is very well done. I feel there is too much sky and too much foreground. The graffiti. I feel , should be more resent. The disrespect to this building adds drama and picks up the sadness that you seem to have seeing this abandoned building. |
Sep 13th |
| 47 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
Great shot. It needs more contrast in my opinion. The color version has more contrast both of light and color. |
Sep 13th |
| 47 |
Sep 21 |
Comment |
The strong angles make this an art photograph, rather than just "a study" or an architectual document. I find the brown tone an addition to the image. I do not like the yellow cast in most sepia photos. You managed the tones very well. The contrast is adequate and you preserved the sunny lighting and light shadows. I disagree with Kirsti's suggestion for a white frame. I think it would actually draw the eye away. I prefer a darker frame. I see some noise in the sky, rather than grain from older negatives. Old photos were not always grainy. Those of us who did a lot of wet developing worked very hard with choice of film and developer to avoid grainy pictures |
Sep 13th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 47
|
12 comments - 0 replies Total
|