|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 26 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I really like the color and the composition is great. What makes it strong was no immediately obvious, but the two main leaves have veins that are diagonal and oppose each other. The picture is very dynamic. The curves of the leaves edges also give a feeling of movement. |
Dec 12th |
| 26 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
Ita's always good to try new things. should do more of experimenting. This is very interesting. I found the wavy and blurry just too difficult to view. I think if it were more wavy and less blurred it might be easier. It is just sharp enough to ake e concentrate on bringing it into focus, even when I know what the picture is.. The blue in the sky looks ok, because if you hadnot told me, I wouldn't know it is raining. |
Dec 12th |
| 26 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I agree with Melinda that the colors need to be enhanced. I think the whole picture other than the water is just too dark. The composition otherwise is very pleasing but I would cut off most of the bottom less you can make it more interesting by bringing up the shadows With a little more attention this picture could be a real winner. |
Dec 12th |
| 26 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
The colors the strong curved lines make this a powerful image. The left side distracts me. I would crop the left even if some the vertical is removed |
Dec 12th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 26
|
| 47 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I love this. The five light bdranches hold together, almost like a single being. Visukally they carry my eye up through the picture and down. Lovely visual harmony |
Dec 12th |
| 47 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I really like photos of this kindof subject. The problem that Jack raises, bothers me. It wollks like the picture is full f artifacts
that look like grain clumping (that dates me-clumping happens when film is badly developed) I think it is over sharpened, because the photo was not sharp. If it is sharp, you could process over again if you kept a copy of the original.I would crop out the dark house on the left. The interesting part of the scene |
Dec 12th |
| 47 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
Darrell, I understand Jack's comments, but I ju"st love the image.
Gently reducing the contrast in the clouds might improve the picture by making it clear that the subject is the dunes. While I think there is too much concern about splitting a picture equally be the horizon is overdone generally, in this picutre I think there is a bit too much clouds. I would crop to the band of bright clouds and then darken the edges. Small points. As is this is a great photograph |
Dec 12th |
| 47 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
Really very nice. The contrast and detail are just right. The holes in the sand are fine. I would crop by bringing down the upper left corner about to the group of 4 blow holes. |
Dec 12th |
| 47 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
The tones are very well handled and the detail of thje bridge and houses is really very good. I think there is a problem. It is not clear what the subjecct is. There are really two pictures. The street cafe and the bridge canal and houses and they don't (in my opinion) really hang together. I think largely because the cafe part is just too dark for the rest of the picture. |
Dec 12th |
| 47 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
Love the tonal balance. I would cro even more aggressively than Ed suggests so that a part of the shadow from the cross forms a leading nine I also would darkene the pillars of the church's little |
Dec 11th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 47
|
10 comments - 0 replies Total
|