|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 26 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Knocks my socks off. I would darken the sky. Bob's suggestion makes the picture more comfortable, but I think at the cost of losing its electricity |
Mar 17th |
| 26 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
I think the sky is fine for this photograph. I would crop much more aggressively right up to the beginning of the band of colored windows(?) of the building on the left. |
Mar 17th |
| 26 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
I agree with Belinda the left should be cropped out. The arrow catches my eye. I do like the composition. I might be tempted to crop out the light color building and just have a vertical of the building with theeople |
Mar 17th |
| 26 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
The color is just lovely. The composition is very good. The green in the wave looks wrong to me. There is a good deal of yellow in the green, which makes it seem unnatural for the ocean. Wave green is usally darker with a hue more blue. I would close out the rock. I wonder how the photograph would look if you worked with it not having dehazed it. |
Mar 17th |
| 26 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
The detail is perfect. I think the brown "stain" in the snow if it is the remnant of the cloned leaf or not (there is a ring of color around the leaf, suggesting that none of the color is from the removed leaf adds interest and suggests a very light or shallow snow--the last of winter. I don't see fuzzines on my computer. |
Mar 17th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 26
|
| 61 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Great shot; expsure is right on; the focus is right where it needs to be. I would crop and clone out the guy in the plaid shirt and the spectators on top. They don't add anything to the shot |
Mar 12th |
| 61 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
A lovely photo of a lovely model, The range of tones is just right. The dark vignetting and the "mat" in grey are very nice touches. Ansel Adams suggested toning the borders or mat to zone 5--no one does it. My only suggestion would be to open the shadows on the eyes particularly on the viewer's left. I like the B&W much better than the color. The red is just too strong |
Mar 12th |
| 61 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
This one is over my head. It looks as if the model completely unconscious and just hung over some beam. In black and white there is too much disorganization in the beams and struts. In color the eye is drawn to the subject, which appears to be a mode, because of the color contrast.Perhaps if you cropped everything except the rectangle with the interior triangle and model, there would be a more effective composition |
Mar 12th |
| 61 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Probably less work to brush and comb, but you did a beautiful job of cloning and masking. I love this portrait.The softness and lighting emphasize the life in her eye, and the Mona Lisa almost smile gives a hint of her personality |
Mar 12th |
| 61 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
Very nicely executed, without a full range of tones from near paper white to black. The expression is very frank and firm, which is very suitable for the swordman portrait. I think the detail in the skin is too much it looks like some skin disease. I actually prefer the color version, which is very pleasing with its warm tone that gives it a painterlu feel. |
Mar 12th |
| 61 |
Mar 17 |
Comment |
I really like Original 2. the headress suggests an earler era and the tone also suggest an earler time. The special effects in the B&W, seems to me to be distracting,and the hed without the chest and shoulders seems unnatural, so the combination doesn't work for me. Original 2 is very nicely composed. Shifting the balance to the left while deeping one eye in the center was a very common compositional device in Dutch and Flemish paintings of the great masters of the 17th cenrtyrt (also sued inn later painting as well. I the model's expression is somewehat playful, but ambiguous. |
Mar 12th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 61
|
11 comments - 0 replies Total
|