|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Thanks, I will consider your comments! |
Mar 22nd |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Steve, I like the subject! But I think that you might consider bumping up the contrast. You might consider Silver Effects. |
Jan 29th |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Thanks, I will consider your comments! |
Jan 29th |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Thanks, Alice! |
Jan 27th |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Thanks, Wanda for your comments! |
Jan 25th |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Yes, it is a bit strong..it needs more feathering.. |
Jan 25th |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Ed, see the version above... |
Jan 24th |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Wanda, Sweet morning shot! I hope that you don't mind..I took the photo into PS, corrected the white balance and vignetted it.... |
Jan 22nd |
 |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
|
Jan 22nd |
 |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Kathy, Nice treatment..I just wonder how it would look in B&W with Silver Effects? |
Jan 22nd |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Thanks, Steve. |
Jan 22nd |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Kathy, thanks for your comments. I have the corrected version. Sent the wrong one. |
Jan 22nd |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Good choice of the antique setting! |
Jan 19th |
| 28 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Ed, I like the wall mural of the model and it's processing with its colors and textures. But for the water droplets(?)on her face. They seem too large and distract, rather than add to the the process. Perhaps, if the droplets were smaller and more translucent... |
Jan 19th |
7 comments - 7 replies for Group 28
|
7 comments - 7 replies Total
|