|
Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
18 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Unless you have a creative reason to vary your image from a classic skull and crossbones, I would try to mimic the classic look with the skull above the bones and no transparency or extra bones. Your use of this skull and bones is creative enough for me and quite good.
I find the skull most interesting and would probably size that more prominently than the bones.
Of course, my suggestions may not look good when executed, but I think it's worth a try. |
Oct 3rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 18
|
20 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I really like your background layering. My only suggestion is to brighten the yellow to give it a "pop"of contrast. |
Oct 6th |
20 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Wonderful, color, contrast, detail and composition with leading lines. Although I think I would prefer to have less detail and contrast in the background and foreground. |
Oct 6th |
20 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Thanks |
Oct 6th |
20 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Very nice.. creative with good compositing.
At first I thought the hand was reaching for the skull, so I gyess I'd move it to the top shelf.
While I like the image overall, the bright reflection on the bookcase needs to be darkened to eliminate the distraction.
It #ounc like your wife is very creative too. |
Oct 5th |
20 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
It may be a fantasy, but I fear for the little girl! Even the swirling clouds foretell impending doom to me.
Very creative with very effective compositing. My compliments.
Sorry the system wouldn't accommodate including your original picture of the girl, your fourth original. |
Oct 5th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 20
|
31 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I think having a dark subject as the focus in any picture is particularly challenging, but you did an excellent job of it. Nevertheless, I find the high contrast, foreground flowers an interesting element but distracting. |
Oct 14th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 31
|
64 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thanks.
I'll add back the contrast as you and othersuggest. |
Oct 17th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
I like the lava flow feeling. |
Oct 17th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Thanks.
You have a good imagination. I like your Sphinx thought. |
Oct 12th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
An interesting viewpoint. I had deliberately opening those shadows to show more detail. I'll revisit it and consider darkening them a bit.
I'll definites darken the brightest highlights.
Thanks , as always. |
Oct 9th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Yes, I prefer this one. |
Oct 6th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I certainly find the foreground mos interesting, but I think it's a necessary complement to the bridge. Super picture! |
Oct 5th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
A striking image! I only sugggest opening the shadows a bit. I think I prefer the color version because of the blue sky and contrasting white. Perhaps that implies darkening the sky in the mono version for more contrast too. |
Oct 5th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I agree with Don. That cropping would be more interesting to me. |
Oct 5th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Beautiful! Good detail, contrast and composition except that it needs straightening for my eye. |
Oct 5th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Magnificent shot. Great timing. Yes, I too could be picky and look for a little more detail. |
Oct 5th |
64 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
I was hoping the contours and details would be sufficiently interesting and didn't want to add a distraction. Oh well! Thanks |
Oct 5th |
5 comments - 6 replies for Group 64
|
12 comments - 6 replies Total
|