|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 85 |
Mar 22 |
Reply |
I was at 209 m. The connection between the spark and control unit was not too good, so I was afraid to fly higher. 250 or 300 m would have been much better, so I need to return with my Mini 2. |
Mar 30th |
| 85 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Technically well done, nice panorama. Concenrning the sky replacement, the original sky doesn't look bad either, maybe some dehaze and increased contrast would have given a good result too. Compositionwise I would cut out (or clone out) the building at the bottom since a small part is anyhow missing. |
Mar 13th |
| 85 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Nice photo, the final is definitely much better than the original, not necessarily because of sharpness, but the colors and contrast I lie more.
Maybe later in the day, the shadows could be longer which could look better. |
Mar 12th |
| 85 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Great place, greal lights and shadows and great photo.
On the original it looks like the horizon line is horizontal, but on the final photo it has an angle, slightly going up towards the right. Maybe it is only an optical illusion. |
Mar 12th |
| 85 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
It's a pita you did not have good light but I think you explored well what this place offered. |
Mar 12th |
4 comments - 1 reply for Group 85
|
4 comments - 1 reply Total
|