|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 73 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Great capture! I am also fine with the blurred foreground. Actually you did not show the ISO you had. If it was not too high you might have used a smaller aperture, like F 8.0 instead of 6.0 and you could get higher depth. |
Dec 26th |
| 73 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Nice autumn colors which are also reflected on the water surface. What I miss is the "falls". I googled to see whether there are falls and yes, there are. It's apity you did not show them. Although the colors make the photo. |
Dec 17th |
| 73 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Indeed, very colorful and not only the leaves but the green of the grass is also nice saturated. Compositionwise I wonder whether it would be better or not if you made a step back and so we could see the whole branch on the top of the image. |
Dec 17th |
| 73 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
The idea itself is interesting. I do not feel it is a street from the 1918 year, maybe because of the colors. I assume that the roofs are cut because they had antennas or something else which makes it obvious that we are in the 21st century. Yet I miss the roofs... |
Dec 17th |
| 73 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
I think it was a good idea to shoot vertical as you have many plans that guide one's eye from the foreground to the sky. The sky and clouds are perfect to me. The canyon itself looks hazy, maybe I would do some dehaze in Lightroom to better see the forms. The very foreground is not very interesting, I wonder whether it adds anything or better to cut is out? |
Dec 17th |
| 73 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
It is difficult to comment the photo since the story is important not what we see. I particularly like the brigth part where the rainbow crosses a white cloud. |
Dec 17th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 73
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|