|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 42 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Good job, nice picture! You could maybe do a more detailed selection in PS when you delete the background, especially in the upper part. |
Apr 21st |
| 42 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Technically correct, yet I miss the impact. When I look at photos I always ask what the artist wanted to tell me? |
Apr 21st |
| 42 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Excellent dramatic picture! |
Apr 21st |
| 42 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Interesting photo, you have good eyes. The lonely lamp makes the photo. |
Apr 21st |
| 42 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Nice shot, Pat and very professional preparation! I would only do some postprocessing on her face and body, get rid of small wrinkles, etc. |
Apr 21st |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 42
|
| 65 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Even before I read Mary's coments, I wanted to suggest to crop the image because the head and eyes are not so sharp. I would try to crop even more, since the wings are the strong part of the image. I assume (you did not give the settings) you cut out this from a much larger image, this is why we have more noise here.
Altogether this is a very nice photo. |
Apr 21st |
| 65 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
It is funny that I have the same camera and same lenses and still, my photos are not so fantastic. What could be the reason? :) :)
To me the most impressive in this photo is the texture of the flower. So soft and vivid, you feel the temptation to touch the picture. |
Apr 21st |
| 65 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Great shot. Composition, lights, colors, everything in place. I personally do not have a problem with the missing space around the edges. To me it suggestes that there are a lot more nuts and bolts around, we see only a small part of a large space. |
Apr 21st |
| 65 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Very original! To me the "eye problem" is not so important as it is not the eye the central element, but the structure, the texture of the skin. In this respect, I would try to increase the contrast, to have an even more dramatic structure. |
Apr 21st |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 65
|
9 comments - 0 replies Total
|