|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 42 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I like the composition, you were lucky with this nice shadow. I would have lightened a bit selectively her face. |
Feb 16th |
| 42 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I wonder what is infact the main subject? If the market, then I would have taken it from a closer point and focus on the goods. If the people, then I would have catched them from another direction, to see their faces. |
Feb 16th |
| 42 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Good composition. To me it is not a problem that the foreground is unsharp. I would however handle the overexposed white "window" |
Feb 16th |
| 42 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Good animal portrait. Mostly sharp, except the left eye and some small parts on the left side of face. but this is not a surprise at 2.8 It is funny how (s)he is looking at the photographer. |
Feb 16th |
| 42 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I like it, original subject! I would have made it slightly darker. |
Feb 16th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 42
|
| 65 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Now I have 3 images to comment - unless I do another clone. Compositionwise it is absolutely fine for me. Also, the texture of the leafs is good, the frog is a funny element. It is amazing how the background changes everything, I think this is the most important lesson we learnt here. |
Feb 16th |
| 65 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
If this was a quiz asking whether this is a real flower or made of platic or glass, I would have been in trouble. Especially the light green petals look "plastic-like". Beautiful colors, texture and composition. |
Feb 16th |
| 65 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
It is a well-composed photo and it is amazing how much post-processing work you did. It was a good idea to use iris blur and make a sharp text surrounded by unsharp corks. However, this difference is a bit too much for me, it is too obvious that not only because of the DOF we see this difference. Also, probably for the same iris blur filter, the top of the bottle neck is too unsharp.
The most important question: who did drink the wine? :) |
Feb 16th |
3 comments - 0 replies for Group 65
|
8 comments - 0 replies Total
|